skip to content
Dovepress - Open Access to Scientific and Medical Research
View our mobile site

8852

Hourly-block and standard patient scheduling systems at two private hospitals in Alexandria

Original Research

(1596) Views  (484) Full article downloads

Authors: Ashraf Ahmad Zaher Zaghloul, Nagwa Younes Abou El Enein

Published Date December 2010 Volume 2010:3 Pages 225 - 232
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S15068

Ashraf Ahmad Zaher Zaghloul1, Nagwa Younes Abou El Enein2
1Health Services Administration Department, College of Health Sciences, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates; 2Department of Health Administration and Behavioural Sciences, High Institute of Public Health, University of Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt

Introduction: Patient appointment systems are of great importance for efficiently managing outpatient clinics as well as patient satisfaction as an indirect indicator for quality care rendered.
Purpose: To describe the hourly block and standard sequential scheduling appointment systems at two different hospitals, as well as to assess the patients' opinions regarding their waiting time in both systems.
Study settings: The study was conducted at ENT (Ear, Nose, and Throat) clinics in two of the biggest and reputable private hospitals in Alexandria. Hospital A follows the standard appointment system and Hospital B follows the hourly block appointment system.
Study design: A cross-sectional descriptive study was designed to compare the two settings.
Results: For new cases, the mean time was longer for the standard system with regards to access time (12.2 ± 5.9) days, while the mean time was longer in the hourly block system with regards to punctuality, waiting time, and consultation time (28.5 ± 12.3, 27.5 ± 17.1, and 14.5 ± 9.0 minutes, respectively). For return cases, the mean time was longer for the standard system with regards to access and punctuality times (14.5 ± 6.1 days and 48.9 ± 27.0 minutes, respectively), while the highest mean times in the hourly block system were for waiting and consultation (19.4 ± 6.9 and 12.3 ± 3.9 minutes, respectively). Most of the patients in both systems preferred the standard appointment system to the hourly block system (73.3% for Hospital A and 55.0% for Hospital B).
Conclusion: Every health care organization should know how to choose the most appropriate method of appointment system and how best to organize it to meet the needs of its patients. Patient scheduling is an important tool for efficient outpatient department management as well as rationally operating outpatient resources and critical areas like physician productivity, patient satisfaction, and practice profits.

Keywords: appointment, schedule, waiting time




 

Other articles by Dr Ashraf Zaghloul



Readers of this article also read:

Long-term sick-leavers with fibromyalgia: Comparing their multidisciplinarily assessed characteristics with those  of others with chronic pain conditions and depression
A controlled study of the effect of a mindfulness-based stress reduction technique in women with multiple chemical sensitivity, chronic fatigue syndrome, and fibromyalgia
Periosteoplasty for covering gingival recessions: Clinical results
Nurse stress at two different organizational settings in Alexandria
Role of aliskiren in cardio-renal protection and use in hypertensives with multiple risk factors
Clinicoradiological features of recurrent ischemic stroke: healthcare for poststroke patients
Reorientation to more health promotion in health services – a study of barriers and possibilities from the perspective of health professionals
Study of pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution of liposomal brucine for dermal administration
Cumulative clinical experience from over a decade of use of levofloxacin in community-acquired pneumonia: critical appraisal and role in therapy
Erratum
  • Testimonials

    "You do a tremendous job!!" Ruben Restrepo, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio