-
Patient Related Outcome Measures
-
About Dovepress
Open access peer-reviewed scientific and medical journals.
-
Open Access
Dove Medical Press is now a member of the Open Access Initiative
-
An Author's Guide
A guide to help authors get their paper published.
-
Advocacy
Support Open Access and Dove Press
-
Reprints
Promotional Article Monitoring - further details
-
Favored Author Program
Real benefits for authors, including fast-track processing of papers.
Health-related restrictions of choices and choosing: implications for quality of life and clinical interventions
Original Research
(1492) Views (451) Full article downloads
Authors: Barry J Gurland, Huai Cheng, Mathew S Maurer
Published Date August 2010
Volume 2010:1 Pages 73 - 80
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S11842
Barry J Gurland1, Huai Cheng2, Mathew S Maurer31Columbia University Department of Psychiatry, Stroud Center for Study of Quality of Life, New York, NY, USA; 2Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; 3Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
Background: The process of “accessing choices and choosing among them” (c-c) has been proposed as a model for understanding, evaluating, and assisting a patient’s management of quality of life. If desired choices are freely accessible, and the act of choosing is efficient and unconstrained, then the outcome is optimized quality of life. The c-c model fits many clinical situations where improved quality of life is a goal, and interventions may be aimed at relieving health-related restrictions of the patient’s desired activities.
Aims: To determine the impact of health restrictions of choices and choosing on indicators and outcomes reflecting quality of life.
Method: Secondary analysis of a community-based health survey of three ethnic groups, 65 years and older (n = 2,130), repeated after 18 months, with mortality over 6 years.
Findings: Complaints of health restrictions of desired activities accounted for about half the variance of all determinants of a quality of life proxy indicator, and had a high frequency. Such complaints also predicted declines in mood and function, higher death rates, and increased service use.
Conclusions: Clinical trials are warranted of the efficacy for quality of life improvement of interventions that focus on the relief of health-induced restrictions of desired activities.
Keywords: choice, quality of life, aging, health restrictions
Readers of this article also read:
Is less more? A preliminary investigation of the number of response categories in self-reported pain
Public and private health care utilization differences between socioeconomic strata in Jamaica
The use of patient-reported outcomes becomes standard practice in the routine clinical care of lung–heart transplant patients
Patient satisfaction with inpatient care provided by the Sydney Gynecological Oncology Group
Solid self-nanoemulsifying cyclosporin A pellets prepared by fluid-bed coating: preparation, characterization and in vitro redispersibility
Editorial
Improvement of adenoviral vector-mediated gene transfer to airway epithelia by folate-modified anionic liposomes
Antioxidant oils and Salmonella enterica Typhimurium reduce tumor in an experimental model of hepatic metastasis
Cumulative clinical experience from over a decade of use of levofloxacin in community-acquired pneumonia: critical appraisal and role in therapy
- Testimonials
"You do a tremendous job!!" Ruben Restrepo, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
- Health literacy and health seeking behavior among older men in a middle-income nation
- Increasing access to quality health care for the poor: Community perceptions on quality care in Uganda
- Prolonged rupture of membranes in term infants: should all babies be screened?
- Narcissistic rage: The Achilles’ heel of the patient with chronic physical illness




