-
Core Evidence
-
About Dovepress
Open access peer-reviewed scientific and medical journals.
-
Open Access
Dove Medical Press is now a member of the Open Access Initiative
-
An Author's Guide
A guide to help authors get their paper published.
-
Advocacy
Support Open Access and Dove Press
-
Reprints
Promotional Article Monitoring - further details
-
Favored Author Program
Real benefits for authors, including fast-track processing of papers.
Fosaprepitant and aprepitant: an update of the evidence for their place in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting
Review
(1807) Views (585) Full article downloads
Authors: Patrick Langford, Paul Chrisp
Published Date September 2010
Volume 2010:5 Pages 77 - 90
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CE.S6012
Patrick Langford1, Paul Chrisp21Prime Medica Ltd, Knutsford, UK; 2Core Medical Publishing, Knutsford, UK; These affiliations
were correct at the time the manuscript was prepared
Introduction: The selective neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist aprepitant is effective in the treatment of acute and delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) associated with both moderately and highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Fosaprepitant has been developed as an intravenous prodrug of aprepitant.
Aims: To update the evidence underlying the use of fosaprepitant to prevent CINV.
Evidence review: Aprepitant in combination with a serotonin antagonist and a corticosteroid controls acute and delayed symptoms of CINV in patients receiving moderately to highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Bioequivalence of fosaprepitant with aprepitant has recently been demonstrated, which has led to its inclusion in clinical guidelines for treatment of acute CINV with highly, and some regimens of moderately, emetogenic chemotherapy. Early studies of the clinical efficacy of fosaprepitant have shown improvement over treatment with ondansetron. Both aprepitant and fosaprepitant are well tolerated with most adverse events observed of mild or moderate intensity. Conflicting economic evidence has shown that whilst aprepitant provides an increased quality of life in patients treated for CINV, there are differing views over its absolute cost in relation to standard therapy. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of aprepitant, however, appears to lie within acceptable bounds.
Place in therapy: Fosaprepitant and aprepitant are recommended in guidelines for preventing CINV due to moderately and highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Fosaprepitant is bioequivalent to aprepitant, and could offer potential benefits for patients who may be unable to tolerate oral administration of antiemetics during an episode of nausea or vomiting.
Keywords: fosaprepitant, aprepitant, chemotherapy, nausea, vomiting
Readers of this article also read:
Role of aliskiren in cardio-renal protection and use in hypertensives with multiple risk factors
Berberine: metabolic and cardiovascular effects in preclinical and clinical trials
Identification of a novel prostate cancer biomarker, caveolin-1: Implications and potential clinical benefit
Perception of risk and benefit in patient-centered communication and care
The relationship between deliberate self-harm behavior, body dissatisfaction, and suicide in adolescents: current concepts
Zinc oxide nanoparticles as selective killers of proliferating cells
Erratum
A case of recurrent bloody tears
Cumulative clinical experience from over a decade of use of levofloxacin in community-acquired pneumonia: critical appraisal and role in therapy
- Testimonials
"... I was impressed at the rapidity of publication from submission to final acceptance." Dr Edwin Thrower, PhD, Yale University
- The benefits and risks of testosterone replacement therapy: a review
- Tenofovir-associated bone density loss
- Drug design with Cdc7 kinase: a potential novel cancer therapy target
- Development of mucosal adjuvants for intranasal vaccine for H5N1 influenza viruses




