Back to Browse Journals » Clinical Interventions in Aging » Volume 7

Facet-sparing lumbar decompression with a minimally invasive flexible MicroBlade Shaver® versus traditional decompression: quantitative radiographic assessment

Authors Lauryssen C, Berven S, Mimran R, Summa C, Sheinberg M, Miller LE, Block JE

Published Date July 2012 Volume 2012:7 Pages 257—266

DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S32536

Received 2 April 2012, Accepted 1 June 2012, Published 20 July 2012

Carl Lauryssen,1 Sigurd Berven,2 Ronnie Mimran,3 Christopher Summa,4 Michael Sheinberg,5 Larry E Miller,6,7 Jon E Block7
1Tower Orthopedics, Beverly Hills, CA, USA; 2Department of Orthopedics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; 3Pacific Brain and Spine, Castro Valley, CA, USA; 4The Spine Clinic of Monterey Bay, Soquel, CA, USA; 5Danville, CA, USA; 6Miller Scientific Consulting Inc, Arden, NC, USA; 7The Jon Block Group, San Francisco, CA, USA

Background: Laminectomy/laminotomy and foraminotomy are well established surgical techniques for treatment of symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis. However, these procedures have significant limitations, including limited access to lateral and foraminal compression and postoperative instability. The purpose of this cadaver study was to compare bone, ligament, and soft tissue morphology following lumbar decompression using a minimally invasive MicroBlade Shaver® instrument versus hemilaminotomy with foraminotomy (HL).
Methods: The iO-Flex® system utilizes a flexible over-the-wire MicroBlade Shaver instrument designed for facet-sparing, minimally invasive “inside-out” decompression of the lumbar spine. Unilateral decompression was performed at 36 levels in nine human cadaver specimens, six with age-appropriate degenerative changes and three with radiographically confirmed multilevel stenosis. The iO-Flex system was utilized on alternating sides from L2/3 to L5/S1, and HL was performed on the opposite side at each level by the same investigator. Spinal canal, facet joint, lateral recess, and foraminal morphology were assessed using computed tomography.
Results: Similar increases in soft tissue canal area and decreases in ligamentum flavum area were noted in nondiseased specimens, although HL required removal of 83% more laminar area (P < 0.01) and 95% more bone resection, including the pars interarticularis and facet joints (P < 0.001), compared with the iO-Flex system. Similar increases in lateral recess diameter were noted in nondiseased specimens using each procedure. In stenotic specimens, the increase in lateral recess diameter was significantly (P = 0.02) greater following use of the iO-Flex system (43%) versus HL (7%). The iO-Flex system resulted in greater facet joint preservation in nondiseased and stenotic specimens. In stenotic specimens, the iO-Flex system resulted in a significantly greater increase in foraminal width compared with HL (24% versus 4%, P = 0.01), with facet joint preservation.
Conclusion: The iO-Flex system resulted in significantly better decompression of the lateral recess and foraminal areas compared with HL, while preserving posterior spinal elements, including the facet joint.

Keywords: decompression, laminectomy, lumbar, minimally invasive, stenosis, MicroBlade Shaver, iO-Flex system

Download Article [PDF] View Full Text [HTML] 

Creative Commons License This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. Permissions beyond the scope of the License are administered by Dove Medical Press Limited. Information on how to request permission may be found at: http://www.dovepress.com/permissions.php

Other articles by this author:

Facial fat grafting with a prototype injection control device

Hetherington HE, Block JE

Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology 2013, 6:201-209

Published Date: 13 September 2013

Axial lumbar interbody fusion: a 6-year single-center experience

Zeilstra DJ, Miller LE, Block JE

Clinical Interventions in Aging 2013, 8:1063-1069

Published Date: 12 August 2013

TranS1 VEO system: a novel psoas-sparing device for transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion

Hardenbrook MA, Miller LE, Block JE

Medical Devices: Evidence and Research 2013, 6:91-95

Published Date: 4 June 2013

The KineSpring® Knee Implant System: an implantable joint-unloading prosthesis for treatment of medial knee osteoarthritis

Clifford AG, Gabriel SM, O’ Connell M, Lowe D, Miller LE, Block JE

Medical Devices: Evidence and Research 2013, 6:69-76

Published Date: 17 May 2013

Successful two-stage revision of a KineSpring® joint unloading implant: a case study

Bowditch M, Miller LE, Block JE

International Medical Case Reports Journal 2012, 5:91-95

Published Date: 12 December 2012

Rationale, characteristics, and clinical performance of the OsteoSponge®: a novel allograft for treatment of osseous defects

Miller LE, Jacofsky DJ, Kirker KR, Fitzpatrick KL, Juda GA, Block JE

Orthopedic Research and Reviews 2012, 4:9-17

Published Date: 3 April 2012

Clinical utility of ultrasound guidance for intra-articular knee injections: a review

Berkoff DJ, Miller LE, Block JE

Clinical Interventions in Aging 2012, 7:89-95

Published Date: 20 March 2012

Percutaneous vertebral augmentation for painful osteolytic vertebral metastasis: a case report

Anselmetti GC, Tutton SM, Facchini FR, Miller LE, Block JE

International Medical Case Reports Journal 2012, 5:13-17

Published Date: 20 March 2012

Readers of this article also read:

Green synthesis of water-soluble nontoxic polymeric nanocomposites containing silver nanoparticles

Prozorova GF, Pozdnyakov AS, Kuznetsova NP, Korzhova SA, Emel’yanov AI, Ermakova TG, Fadeeva TV, Sosedova LM

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2014, 9:1883-1889

Published Date: 16 April 2014

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of acetylsalicylic acid after intravenous and oral administration to healthy volunteers

Nagelschmitz J, Blunck M, Kraetzschmar J, Ludwig M, Wensing G, Hohlfeld T

Clinical Pharmacology: Advances and Applications 2014, 6:51-59

Published Date: 19 March 2014

Population pharmacokinetics of olprinone in healthy male volunteers

Kunisawa T, Kasai H, Suda M, Yoshimura M, Sugawara A, Izumi Y, Iida T, Kurosawa A, Iwasaki H

Clinical Pharmacology: Advances and Applications 2014, 6:43-50

Published Date: 4 March 2014

Methacrylic-based nanogels for the pH-sensitive delivery of 5-Fluorouracil in the colon

Ashwanikumar N, Kumar NA, Nair SA, Kumar GS

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2012, 7:5769-5779

Published Date: 15 November 2012

A novel preparation method for silicone oil nanoemulsions and its application for coating hair with silicone

Hu Z, Liao M, Chen Y, Cai Y, Meng L, Liu Y, Lv N, Liu Z, Yuan W

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2012, 7:5719-5724

Published Date: 12 November 2012

Cross-linked acrylic hydrogel for the controlled delivery of hydrophobic drugs in cancer therapy

Deepa G, Thulasidasan AK, Anto RJ, Pillai JJ, Kumar GS

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2012, 7:4077-4088

Published Date: 27 July 2012

Detemir as a once-daily basal insulin in type 2 diabetes

Nelson SE

Clinical Pharmacology: Advances and Applications 2011, 3:27-37

Published Date: 18 August 2011

Crystallization after intravitreal ganciclovir injection

Pitipol Choopong, Nattaporn Tesavibul, Nattawut Rodanant

Clinical Ophthalmology 2010, 4:709-711

Published Date: 14 July 2010