-
Cancer Management and Research
-
About Dovepress
Open access peer-reviewed scientific and medical journals.
-
Open Access
Dove Medical Press is now a member of the Open Access Initiative
-
An Author's Guide
A guide to help authors get their paper published.
-
Advocacy
Support Open Access and Dove Press
-
Reprints
Promotional Article Monitoring - further details
-
Favored Author Program
Real benefits for authors, including fast-track processing of papers.
FACE: the barefaced facts of AI potency
Review
(1656) Views (387) Full article downloads
Authors: Alain Monnier
Published Date October 2010
Volume 2010:2 Pages 267 - 276
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S13511
Alain MonnierInstitut Régional Fédératif du Cancer (IFRC), Centre Hospitalier Belfort-Montbéliard, Montbeliard Cedex, France
Abstract: The use of third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs), such as anastrozole and letrozole, as initial adjuvant hormonal therapy in postmenopausal women (PMW) with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer offers a significant benefit over tamoxifen for reducing recurrence risk. Clinical studies, including the Arimidex Tamoxifen Alone or in Combination (ATAC) and the Breast International Group (BIG) 1-98 trials, have proven that both anastrozole and letrozole are, respectively, superior to tamoxifen in improving disease-free survival. Although differing in design, objectives, and follow-up time, these trials offer some insight into the comparative clinical efficacy of these two nonsteroidal AIs. In particular, results from BIG 1-98 show that letrozole significantly reduces early distant metastatic (DM) events, which constitute the majority of early recurrence events. Subsequently, there is a beneficial overall survival effect emerging in the trial, whereas survival is unchanged with anastrozole after 100 months of follow-up in ATAC. Significant differences in the potency of these two drugs, vis-à-vis their degree of aromatase inhibition, have been observed in comparative trials and show that letrozole causes a more complete suppression of estrogen levels than does anastrozole. Whether this difference in potency is relevant to reductions in DM events during adjuvant therapy remains unclear. The Femara Anastrozole Clinical Evaluation trial is addressing this issue in a more unequivocal manner by comparing initial adjuvant treatment with anastrozole or letrozole in a population of breast cancer patients at high risk of recurrence: PMW with HR+ disease and axillary lymph node involvement.
Keywords: anastrozole, aromatase inhibitors, hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer, letrozole, postmenopausal women, tamoxifen
Other articles by Dr Alain Monnier
Readers of this article also read:
Evidence-based decision-making within the context of globalization: A “Why–What–How” for leaders and managers of health care organizations
Long-term efficacy and safety of anastrozole for adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer in postmenopausal women
Role of aliskiren in cardio-renal protection and use in hypertensives with multiple risk factors
Aromatase inhibitor strategies in metastatic breast cancer
Long-term efficacy and safety of letrozole for the adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer in postmenopausal women: a review
Ixabepilone development across the breast cancer continuum: a paradigm shift
Pharmacogenetics in breast cancer: steps toward personalized medicine in breast cancer management
Quality of life of breast cancer patients medicated with anti-estrogens, 2 years after acupuncture treatment: a qualitative study
Review of catumaxomab in the treatment of malignant ascites
- Testimonials
"... I was impressed at the rapidity of publication from submission to final acceptance." Dr Edwin Thrower, PhD, Yale University
- Epigenomics in cancer management
- Intercellular cancer collisions generate an ejected crystal comet tail effect with fractal interface embryoid body reassembly transformation
- Topotecan in the treatment of relapsed small cell lung cancer
- Role of trabectedin in the treatment of soft tissue sarcoma




