Exploring the understanding of evidence-based concepts in people with type 2 diabetes
Tammy C Hoffmann,1,2 Chris B Del Mar1
1Centre for Research in Evidence-Based Practice, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, 2School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Background: Being able to make informed decisions is a prerequisite to enabling individuals to participate actively in their health care. In turn, an individual’s understanding of relevant health information can influence his/her ability to make informed decisions. However, there are two broad categories of health information, ie, background information (such as the pathophysiology of conditions) and foreground information (such as disease behavior, prognosis, and effects of treatment). Questions about foreground information are central to evidence-based practice. The majority of health literacy research has focused on background information, yet foreground information is more useful in decision-making, particularly for evidence-informed decisions. In people with type 2 diabetes, we explored individuals’ knowledge of selected evidence-based concepts in diabetes; beliefs about what they can do to manage their diabetes and sources of this information; and whether these change after diabetes education.
Methods: Attendees with type 2 diabetes (n = 95) at a one-day diabetes educational exposition completed a questionnaire before and after the event. We asked participants about evidence-based concepts in diabetes and compared their responses with the current evidence. We also asked participants how they could best manage their diabetes, and then, how they knew this.
Results: Most participants underestimated their risk of complications. With the exception of a question about exercise and glycosylated hemoglobin level, nearly all participants provided responses that are not supported by current research evidence. There was no significant change in the percentage of participants who answered questions correctly after the exposition, except for a question about the risks of low blood glucose in which more participants answered incorrectly afterwards (P = 0.01). Health professionals were the most frequently identified source of information, with little value placed on research evidence.
Conclusion: Participants had a poor understanding of most of the evidence-based concepts in type 2 diabetes that were explored. This disadvantages them in being able to make informed decisions about their health care and actively manage their diabetes.
Keywords: type 2 diabetes, evidence-based practice, health literacy, patient education
This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. Permissions beyond the scope of the License are administered by Dove Medical Press Limited. Information on how to request permission may be found at: http://www.dovepress.com/permissions.php
Readers of this article also read:
Nascimento RC, Mabel H, Queiroz BN, Paresque R
Published Date: 14 June 2013
Published Date: 24 April 2013
Galanti G, Stefani L, Gensini GF
Published Date: 16 April 2013
Published Date: 27 February 2013
Factors associated with staff and physician influenza immunization at a children's hospital in Ontario, Canada
Deonandan R, Al-Sulaiti G, Gajaria A, Suh KN
Published Date: 23 August 2012
Hadano Y, Shimizu T, Takada S, Inoue T, Sorano S
Published Date: 22 August 2012
Clinical differences between influenza A (H1N1) virus and respiratory infection between the two waves in 2009 and 2010
Zarogoulidis P, Glaros D, Kioumis I, Terzi E, Porpodis K, Tsiotsios A, Kallianos A, Trakada G, Machairiotis N, Stylianaki A, Sakas A, Rapti A, Courcoutsakis N, Constantinidis TC, Maltezos E, Zarogoulidis K
Published Date: 13 August 2012
Cumulative clinical experience from over a decade of use of levofloxacin in community-acquired pneumonia: critical appraisal and role in therapy
Noreddin AM, Elkhatib WF, Cunnion KM, Zhanel GG
Published Date: 7 October 2011
Intravenous zoledronic acid for the treatment of osteoporosis: The evidence of its therapeutic effect
E Michael Lewiecki
Published Date: 18 June 2009
Eduardo Pimenta, Suzanne Oparil
Published Date: 19 May 2009