-
Patient Preference and Adherence
-
About Dovepress
Open access peer-reviewed scientific and medical journals.
-
Open Access
Dove Medical Press is now a member of the Open Access Initiative
-
An Author's Guide
A guide to help authors get their paper published.
-
Advocacy
Support Open Access and Dove Press
-
Reprints
Promotional Article Monitoring - further details
-
Favored Author Program
Real benefits for authors, including fast-track processing of papers.
Effect of shared decision-making on therapeutic alliance in addiction health care
Original Research
(2508) Views (567) Full article downloads
Authors: EAG Joosten, GH de Weert, T Sensky, CPF van der Staak, CAJ de Jong
Published Date October 2008
Volume 2008:2 Pages 277 - 285
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S4149
EAG Joosten1,2, GH de Weert3, T Sensky4, CPF van der Staak5, CAJ de Jong1,2
1Novadic-Kentron, Network for Addiction Treatment Services, Vught, the Netherlands; 2Nijmegen Institute for Scientist-Practitioners in Addiction (NISPA), Nijmegen, the Netherlands; 3Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Health Care, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; 4Department of Psychological Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; 5Academic Centre for Social Sciences, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
Background: In recent decades, shared decision-making (SDM) models have been developed to increase patient involvement in treatment decisions. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of a shared decision-making intervention (SDMI) for substance-dependent patients on patients’ and clinicians’ perceptions of therapeutic alliance.
Methods: Clinicians were randomly assigned to SDMI or usual procedures to reach a treatment agreement. SDMI is a structured, manualized, 5-session procedure to facilitate treatment agreement and consists of five standardized sessions.
Results: Patients’ perceptions of the therapeutic alliance were very favorable at start of treatment, and no differences were found between intervention groups. Clinicians’ scores on perceived helpfulness and on the overall therapeutic alliance were higher in the SDMI group than in the controls, after 8 weeks of treatment and at the end of treatment.
Conclusion: The present study has shown that a specific intervention to enhance shared decision-making results in favorable changes in clinicians’ perceptions of the therapeutic alliance.
Keywords: therapeutic alliance, helping alliance, shared decision-making, addiction, substance-dependence
- 8th Annual Patient Adherence, Communications & Engagement Summit
31 May - 1 June 2011, Hotel Concorde, Berlin
- Testimonials
"... I was impressed at the rapidity of publication from submission to final acceptance." Dr Edwin Thrower, PhD, Yale University
- Health literacy and health seeking behavior among older men in a middle-income nation
- Increasing access to quality health care for the poor: Community perceptions on quality care in Uganda
- Prolonged rupture of membranes in term infants: should all babies be screened?
- Narcissistic rage: The Achilles’ heel of the patient with chronic physical illness




