skip to content
Dovepress - Open Access to Scientific and Medical Research
View our mobile site

8847

Differential associations between actual and expected GP practice prescribing rates for statins, ACE inhibitors, and beta-blockers: a cross-sectional study in England

(2242) Views  (288) Full article downloads

Authors: Paul R Ward, Peter R Noyce, Antony S St Leger

Published Date January 2005 Volume 2005:1(1) Pages 61 - 68
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S

Paul R Ward1, Peter R Noyce2, Antony S St Leger3

1School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, England, UK; 2School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Manchester, England, UK; 3School of Epidemiology and Health Sciences, University of Manchester, England, UK

Aim: To explore the relationship between actual and expected general medical practitioner (GP) practice prescribing rates for statins, angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, and beta-blockers.

Background: There is a growing body of literature highlighting inequities in GP practice prescribing rates for many drug therapies. The equity of prescribing is of central importance in the area of therapeutics since it explores the interface between those patients who should and those who actually do receive a drug therapy.

Setting: Four primary care trusts (PCTs 1–4) in the North West of England, including 132 GP practices.

Methods: Actual and expected prescribing rates for statins, beta-blockers, and ACE inhibitors were specifically developed for each GP practice.

Results: There were no statistically significant correlations between actual and expected prescribing rates in PCT2 and PCT3, although in PCT1 there were statistically significant correlations for statins (0.286, p < 0.05) and ACE inhibitors (0.381, p < 0.01). In PCT4, correlations were moderate to high for beta-blockers (0.693, p < 0.01), and moderate for statins (0.541, p < 0.05) and ACE inhibitors (0.585, p < 0.01). Scatterplots highlighted large variations between individual GP practices (both within and between PCTs) in terms of the relationship between actual and expected prescribing rates.

Conclusion: This paper highlights variability between PCTs and GP practices in terms of the relationship between actual and expected prescribing rates. The findings from this paper may further advance the suggestion of inequities in prescribing rates for coronary heart disease (CHD) drugs, and studies such as this may be repeated in different therapeutic areas, healthcare settings, and countries.

Keywords: prescribing rates, equity, coronary heart disease, statins, beta-blockers, ACE inhibitor








Readers of this article also read:

Prolonged rupture of membranes in term infants: should all babies be screened?
Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of tiotropium versus salmeterol in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
One-pill once-a-day HAART: a simplification strategy that improves adherence and quality of life of HIV-infected subjects
Subset-directed antiviral treatment of 142 herpesvirus patients with chronic fatigue syndrome
Pharmacological modulation of brain levels of glutamate and GABA in rats exposed to total sleep deprivation
Jet lag syndrome: circadian organization, pathophysiology, and management strategies
Corrigendum - Functional mobility and balance in community dwelling elderly submitted to multisensory versus strength exercises
Management of traumatic events: influence of emotion-centered coping strategies on the occurrence of dissociation and post-traumatic stress disorder
Minimally invasive biomarker confirms glial activation present in Alzheimer's disease: a preliminary study
Corrigendum