-
Vascular Health and Risk Management
-
About Dovepress
Open access peer-reviewed scientific and medical journals.
-
Open Access
Dove Medical Press is now a member of the Open Access Initiative
-
An Author's Guide
A guide to help authors get their paper published.
-
Advocacy
Support Open Access and Dove Press
-
Reprints
Promotional Article Monitoring - further details
-
Favored Author Program
Real benefits for authors, including fast-track processing of papers.
Determinants of outcome in patients eligible for thrombolysis for ischemic stroke
(2416) Views (584) Full article downloads
Authors: Valeria Caso, Maurizio Paciaroni, Michele Venti, Francesco Palmerini, Giorgio Silvestrelli, et al
Published Date November 2007
Volume 2007:3(5) Pages 749 - 754
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S
Valeria Caso, Maurizio Paciaroni, Michele Venti, Francesco Palmerini, Giorgio Silvestrelli, Paolo Milia, Sergio Biagini, Giancarlo Agnelli
Stroke Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Ospedale Silvestrini Perugia, Italy
Objectives: Eligibility criteria for thrombolysis in ischemic stroke have been clearly defined. However, not all eligible patients benefit from this treatment. This study aimed to assess the determinants for clinical outcome in consecutive, eligible patients with ischemic stroke treated with thrombolysis in a single-center study.
Methods: Consecutive patients with ischemic stroke were treated with tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) following the established eligibility National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) and European Stroke Initiative (EUSI) criteria. Risk factors including blood pressure and pre-treatment glycemia were properly managed. Death and disability at 3 months were the study outcomes. Disability was evaluated by the Rankin-scale. Favorable outcome was defined as 0–2 and adverse outcome as 3–6 including death.
Results: Seventy-eight patients were included in the study in a single stroke unit. The mean age was 70.9 ± 13.2 years (range 36–94). Follow-up at 3 months was completed in 73 patients. A favorable outcome was observed in 37 patients (50%) and adverse outcome in 36 (36%). Nine patients (12.3%) died within 3 months. The presence of an occluded carotid artery was a strong predictor for adverse outcome (p > 0.0001). A low NIH Stroke Scale-Score (NIHSS) at admission was a associated with a favorable outcome, while history of diabetes mellitus led to an unfavorable outcome.
Conclusion: Among patients eligible for thrombolysis, many do not benefit from this treatment. These include patients with carotid occlusion and diabetes.
Keywords: thrombolysis, stroke, outcome, diabetes, carotid artery occlusion
Readers of this article also read:
Evidence-based decision-making within the context of globalization: A “Why–What–How” for leaders and managers of health care organizations
Berberine: metabolic and cardiovascular effects in preclinical and clinical trials
Impact of nutrition on serum percentage in heifers
Fitting the pieces together: current research on the genetic basis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)
Daptomycin: a novel lipopeptide antibiotic against Gram-positive pathogens
Effect of HIV infection on time to recovery from an acute manic episode
Corrigendum - Functional mobility and balance in community dwelling elderly submitted to multisensory versus strength exercises
Erratum
Erratum
- Join ISVH
Be part of the World's leading experts in vascular health by joining the International Society of Vascular Health (ISVH)
- Testimonials
"... I was impressed at the rapidity of publication from submission to final acceptance." Dr Edwin Thrower, PhD, Yale University
- The western diet and lifestyle and diseases of civilization
- Stiffness of the large arteries in individuals with and without Down syndrome
- Effects of Azelnidipine plus OlmesaRTAn versus amlodipine plus olmesartan on central blood pressure and left ventricular mass index: the AORTA study
- Vascular effects of rapid-acting insulin analogs in the diabetic patient: a review




