-
Cancer Management and Research
-
About Dovepress
Open access peer-reviewed scientific and medical journals.
-
Open Access
Dove Medical Press is now a member of the Open Access Initiative
-
An Author's Guide
A guide to help authors get their paper published.
-
Advocacy
Support Open Access and Dove Press
-
Reprints
Promotional Article Monitoring - further details
-
Favored Author Program
Real benefits for authors, including fast-track processing of papers.
Critical appraisal of temozolomide formulations in the treatment of primary brain tumors: patient considerations
Review
(2626) Views (1491) Full article downloads
Authors: Margarita García, Ana Clopés, Jordi Bruna
Published Date October 2009
Volume 2009:1 Pages 137 - 150
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S5598
Margarita García,1 Ana Clopés,2 Jordi Bruna,3 María Martínez,4 Eduard Fort,2 Miguel Gil5
1Clinical Research Unit, Institut Català d’Oncologia-IDIBeLL, L’Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain; 2Pharmacy Department, Institut Català d’Oncologia-IDIBeLL, L’Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain; 3Neurology Department and Neuro-Oncology Unit, Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge-IDIBeLL, L’Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain; 4Oncology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain; 5Oncology Department and Neuro-Oncology Unit, Institut Català d’Oncologia-IDIBeLL, L’Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain
Abstract: Chemotherapy is assuming an increasingly important role in the treatment of malignant gliomas, of which temozolomide (TMZ ) is a key part. TMZ belongs to a class of second-generation imidazotetrazinone prodrugs that exhibit linear pharmacokinetics and do not require hepatic metabolism for activation to the active metabolite. New intravenous (iv) TMZ formulations have recently been approved based on studies of bioequivalence between iv and oral TMZ. The efficacy of TMZ was initially evaluated in patients with recurrent disease but phase II and III trials in newly diagnosed gliomas are available. The results of a large phase III trial that compared RT alone vs RT concomitant with oral TMZ created a new standard of adjuvant treatment. Efficacy data for iv TMZ on which its approval was based are those extrapolated from clinical trials with oral TMZ. No comparative data are available on the differences in tolerability and patient satisfaction between oral and iv formulations of TMZ, or for quality of life. New oral formulations could encourage the adherence of patients to treatment. Although patients presumably would prefer oral treatment, iv formulations may be an alternative in noncompliant patients or patients for whom good adherence could not be expected.
Keywords: temozolomide, brain tumors, new formulations, patient considerations, chemotherapy, glioblastoma
Readers of this article also read:
Role of aliskiren in cardio-renal protection and use in hypertensives with multiple risk factors
The pathophysiology of bronchiectasis
Health literacy and health seeking behavior among older men in a middle-income nation
Functional mobility and balance in community-dwelling elderly submitted to multisensory versus strength exercises
Retinal nerve fiber layer evaluation in multiple sclerosis with spectral domain optical coherence tomography
Perception of risk and benefit in patient-centered communication and care
The relationship between deliberate self-harm behavior, body dissatisfaction, and suicide in adolescents: current concepts
Zinc oxide nanoparticles as selective killers of proliferating cells
Cumulative clinical experience from over a decade of use of levofloxacin in community-acquired pneumonia: critical appraisal and role in therapy
- Testimonials
"... I was impressed at the rapidity of publication from submission to final acceptance." Dr Edwin Thrower, PhD, Yale University
- Epigenomics in cancer management
- Intercellular cancer collisions generate an ejected crystal comet tail effect with fractal interface embryoid body reassembly transformation
- Topotecan in the treatment of relapsed small cell lung cancer
- Role of trabectedin in the treatment of soft tissue sarcoma




