skip to content
Dovepress - Open Access to Scientific and Medical Research
View our mobile site

8129

Critical appraisal of amlodipine and olmesartan medoxomil fixed-dose combination in achieving blood pressure goals

Review

(1543) Views  (851) Full article downloads

Author: Jan Basile

Published Date June 2010 Volume 2010:3 Pages 91 - 104
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IBPC.S9691

Jan Basile

Professor of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA

Abstract: Hypertension remains a significant health burden in the United States, with almost one in three adults affected, and is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular and renal disease. The goal of antihypertensive treatment is to reduce cardiovascular and renal morbidity and mortality by reducing blood pressure (BP). Guidelines recommend a target BP of <140/90 mmHg, with a more stringent goal of <130/80 mmHg for patients with diabetes and chronic renal disease. However, BP goal attainment rates remain low and most patients require therapy with two or more antihypertensive agents. Combination antihypertensive therapy usually employs agents from different classes, thus benefitting from complementary mechanisms of action to achieve greater BP control with fewer side effects. Patient adherence to therapy is enhanced by formulating treatments as fixed-dose (single-pill) combinations. One example is the combination of amlodipine, a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker (CCB), with olmesartan medoxomil, an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB). Here, the rationale for the use of CCB/ARB combination therapy is discussed, as well as the pharmacology and tolerability of the amlodipine/olmesartan medoxomil combination and its efficacy in terms of achieving BP goal in patients with hypertension. Advantages of its use from the patient’s perspective are also discussed.

Keywords: amlodipine, angiotensin receptor blockers, calcium channel blockers, fixed-dose combination therapy, hypertension, olmesartan medoxomil






  • Testimonials

    "... I was impressed at the rapidity of publication from submission to final acceptance." Dr Edwin Thrower, PhD, Yale University