-
Vascular Health and Risk Management
-
About Dovepress
Open access peer-reviewed scientific and medical journals.
-
Open Access
Dove Medical Press is now a member of the Open Access Initiative
-
An Author's Guide
A guide to help authors get their paper published.
-
Advocacy
Support Open Access and Dove Press
-
Reprints
Promotional Article Monitoring - further details
-
Favored Author Program
Real benefits for authors, including fast-track processing of papers.
Computerized history-taking as a tool to manage dyslipidemia
Original Research
(1610) Views (362) Full article downloads
Authors: David Zakim, Christine Fritz, Niko Braun, et al
Published Date November 2010
Volume 2010:6 Pages 1039 - 1046
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S14302
David Zakim1, Christine Fritz2, Niko Braun1,3, Peter Fritz1, M Dominik Alscher1,31Institute for Digital Medicine, Stuttgart, Germany; 2University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany; 3Robert Bosch Krankenhaus, Stuttgart, Germany
Background: Validated guidelines to manage low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol are utilized inconsistently or not at all even though their application lowers the incidence of coronary events. New approaches are needed, therefore, to implement these guidelines in everyday practice.
Methods and results: We compared an automated method for applying The National Cholesterol Education Panel (NCEP) guidelines with results from routine care for managing LDL-cholesterol. The automated method comprised computerized history-taking and analysis of historical data without physician input. Results from routine care were determined for 213 unselected patients and compared with results from interviews of the same 213 patients by a computerized history-taking program. Data extracted from hospital charts showed that routine care typically did not collect sufficient information to stratify risk and assign treatment targets for LDL-cholesterol and that there were inconsistencies in identifying patients with normal or elevated levels of LDL-cholesterol in relation to risk. The computerized interview program outperformed routine care in collecting historical data relevant to stratifying risk, assigning treatment targets, and clarifying the presence of hypercholesterolemia relative to risk.
Conclusions: Computerized history-taking coupled with automated analysis of the clinical data can outperform routine medical care in applying NCEP guidelines for stratifying risk and identifying patients with hypercholesterolemia in relation to risk.
Keywords: dyslipidemia, coronary disease, prevention, management, computerized-history taking
Readers of this article also read:
Role of aliskiren in cardio-renal protection and use in hypertensives with multiple risk factors
Berberine: metabolic and cardiovascular effects in preclinical and clinical trials
Cardiac risk stratification: Role of the coronary calcium score
Impact of a diabetic foot care education program on lower limb amputation rate
Low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol: current status and future strategies for management
COSEHC global vascular risk management quality improvement program: rationale and design
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug gastropathy: new avenues for safety
New treatment options in the management of hypertension: appraising the potential role of azilsartan medoxomil
Cardiac ryanodine receptor in metabolic syndrome: is JTV519 (K201) future therapy?
- Join ISVH
Be part of the World's leading experts in vascular health by joining the International Society of Vascular Health (ISVH)
- Testimonials
"... I was impressed at the rapidity of publication from submission to final acceptance." Dr Edwin Thrower, PhD, Yale University
- The western diet and lifestyle and diseases of civilization
- Stiffness of the large arteries in individuals with and without Down syndrome
- Effects of Azelnidipine plus OlmesaRTAn versus amlodipine plus olmesartan on central blood pressure and left ventricular mass index: the AORTA study
- Vascular effects of rapid-acting insulin analogs in the diabetic patient: a review




