skip to content
Dovepress - Open Access to Scientific and Medical Research
View our mobile site

8847

Computational studies of NMDA receptors: differential effects of neuronal activity on efficacy of competitive and noncompetitive antagonists

Original Research

(2956) Views  (374) Full article downloads

Authors: Nicolas Ambert, Renaud Greget, Olivier Haeberlé, et al

Published Date August 2010 Volume 2010:2 Pages 113 - 125
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OAB.S7246

Nicolas Ambert1, Renaud Greget1,2, Olivier Haeberlé2, Serge Bischoff1, Theodore W Berger3,4, Jean-Marie Bouteiller3,4, Michel Baudry3,4
1Rhenovia Pharma, Mulhouse, France; 2MIPS, Mulhouse, France; 3Neuroscience Program, 4Department of Biomedical Engineering and Center for Neural Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Abstract: N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) play important physiological as well as pathological roles in the central nervous system (CNS). While NMDAR competitive antagonists, such as D-2-amino-5-phosphopentanoic acid (AP5) have been shown to impair learning and memory, the noncompetitive antagonist, memantine, is paradoxically beneficial in mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients. It has been proposed that differences in kinetic properties could account for antagonist functional differences. Here we present a new elaborated kinetic model of NMDARs that incorporates binding sites for the agonist (glutamate) and coagonist (glycine), channel blockers, such as memantine and magnesium (Mg2+), as well as competitive antagonists. We first validated and optimized the parameters used in the model by comparing simulated results with a wide range of experimental data from the literature. We then evaluated the effects of stimulation frequency and membrane potential (Vm) on the characteristics of AP5 and memantine inhibition of NMDARs. Our results indicated that the inhibitory effects of AP5 were not strongly affected by Vm, but decreased with increasing stimulation frequency. In contrast, memantine inhibitory effects decreased with both increasing Vm and stimulation frequency. They support the idea that memantine could provide tonic blockade of NMDARs under basal stimulation conditions without blocking their activation during learning. Moreover they underline the necessity of considering receptor kinetics and the value of the biosimulation approach to better understand mechanisms of drug action and to identify new ways of regulating receptor function.
Keywords: kinetic model, stimulation frequency, memantine, AP5, biosimulation, systems neurobiology






Readers of this article also read:

Role of aliskiren in cardio-renal protection and use in hypertensives with multiple risk factors
Refinement of rigid-body protein–protein docking using backbone and side-chain minimization with a coarse-grained model
Modeling short-term antidepressant responsiveness with artificial neural networks
Molecular docking studies on the activity of naturally occurring pyranochalcones on the transcriptional regulator enzyme of Pseudomonas putida
Assessing 3D scores for protein structure fragment mining
The interpretation of protein structures based on graph theory and contact map
Perception of risk and benefit in patient-centered communication and care
The relationship between deliberate self-harm behavior, body dissatisfaction, and suicide in adolescents: current concepts
Zinc oxide nanoparticles as selective killers of proliferating cells
Cumulative clinical experience from over a decade of use of levofloxacin in community-acquired pneumonia: critical appraisal and role in therapy