Comparison of a new PillCam™ SB2 video capsule versus the standard PillCam™ SB for detection of small bowel disease
Yoav C Metzger1, Samuel N Adler2, Ariella Bar-Gil Shitrit3, Binyamin Koslowsky4, Ingvar Bjarnason5
1School of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel; 2Department of Gastroenterology, Bikur Holim Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel; 3Department of Gastroenterology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel; 4Department of Medicine, Hadassah Medical Organization, Jerusalem, Israel; 5Department of Gastroenterology, King’s College Hospital, London, UK
Background: Capsule endoscopy is the procedure of choice for many suspected small bowel diseases. PillCam™ small bowel (SB), has a high diagnostic yield. No improvements have been made on its optics since its introduction in 2002.
Aim: To compare the diagnostic yield and quality of visualization of PillCam™ SB with that of a new small bowel endoscope (PillCam™ SB2) which has a larger angle of view and upgraded visual attributes.
Methods: Twenty patients were randomized to undergo capsule enteroscopy with PillCam™ SB and PillCam™ SB2 a week apart.
Results: Both procedures had a comparable diagnostic yield. However images from PillCam™ SB2 were found to be significantly better in regards of homogenous light exposure (P < 0.001), sharpness and resolution (P < 0.001), depth of view (P < 0.005), and overall impression (P < 0.0001).
Conclusion: PillCam™ SB2 appears to be superior to the original PillCam™ SB in regard to quality of images obtained.
Keywords: small bowel, capsule endoscopy, image quality, resolution
This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. Permissions beyond the scope of the License are administered by Dove Medical Press Limited. Information on how to request permission may be found at: http://www.dovepress.com/permissions.php
Readers of this article also read:
Lee JY, Kho S, Yoo HB, Park S, Choi JS, Kwon JS, Cha KR, Jung HY
Published Date: 17 April 2014
Sulforaphane-induced transcription of thioredoxin reductase in lens: possible significance against cataract formation
Varma SD, Chandrasekaran K, Kovtun S
Published Date: 24 October 2013
Ashwanikumar N, Kumar NA, Nair SA, Kumar GS
Published Date: 15 November 2012
Effect of molecular weight of polyethyleneimine on loading of CpG oligodeoxynucleotides onto flake-shell silica nanoparticles for enhanced TLR9-mediated induction of interferon-α
Manoharan Y, Ji Q, Yamazaki T, Chinnathambi S, Chen S, Ganesan S, Hill JP, Ariga K, Hanagata N
Published Date: 16 July 2012
Synchronous cecal adenocarcinoma and multiple colonic in situ carcinomas in hamartomatous polyps in a case of isolated Peutz–Jeghers syndrome
Yahia Z Gad, Doaa H Bakr, Mohammad G El-Ebeidy
Published Date: 18 March 2011
Marty Hinz, Alvin Stein, George Trachte, et al
Published Date: 7 October 2010
Complex comprised of dextran magnetite and conjugated cisplatin exhibiting selective hyperthermic and controlled-release potential
Akinaga Sonoda, Norihisa Nitta, Ayumi Nitta-Seko, et al
Published Date: 14 July 2010
A review and empirical study of the composite scales of the Das–Naglieri cognitive assessment system
Simon M McCrea
Published Date: 18 March 2009
Comparative in vivo bioequivalence and in vitro dissolution of two valproic acid sustained-release formulations
Akira Fujii, Norio Yasui-Furukori, Taku Nakagami, Takenori Niioka, Manabu Saito, et al
Published Date: 11 August 2008
Simultaneous transdermal extraction of glucose and lactate from human subjects by reverse iontophoresis
Tak S Ching, Patricia Connolly
Published Date: 30 June 2008