skip to content
Dovepress - Open Access to Scientific and Medical Research
View our mobile site

8847

Comparison between automated and manual measurements of carotid intima-media thickness in clinical practice

Original Research

(3174) Views  (905) Full article downloads

Authors: Cláudia Maria Vilas Freire, Antonio Luiz Pinho Ribeiro, Felipe Batista Lima Barbosa, et al

Published Date September 2009 Volume 2009:5 Pages 811 - 817
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S5745

Cláudia Maria Vilas Freire1,2, Antonio Luiz Pinho Ribeiro1, Felipe Batista Lima Barbosa1, Anelise Impelisiere Nogueira1, Maria Cristina Costa de Almeida1,2, Márcia Melo Barbosa2, Ângela Maria Quintão Lana3, Ana Cristina Simões e Silva4, Antônio Ribeiro-Oliveira Jr1

1Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, 3Statistics Laboratory, Veterinary Department, 4Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil; 2Ecocenter, Hospital Socor, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil

Background and aim: The measurement of carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) has been used as a marker of arterial wall disease. Manual measurements have been performed in most epidemiological studies, but, due to the introduction of new technologies, automated software has been increasingly used. This study aimed to compare manual versus automated cIMT measurements in common carotid (CC), bifurcation (BIF), and internal carotid (IC).

Methods: Automated and manual cIMT measurements were performed online in 43 middle-aged females. Carotid segment measurements were compared by Bland–Altman plot and the variation and repeatability coefficients between observers were also determined for comparison.

Results: The average timespan for manual measurements (57.30 s) were significantly higher than for automated measurements (2.52 s). There were no systematic errors between methods in any carotid segments. The variation coefficient was 5.54% to 6.34% for CC and BIF, 9.76% for IC, and absolute differences were 85% below 0.1 mm and 70% below 0.05 mm. Interobserver agreement showed no systematic error. The variation and the repeatability coefficients were better for the automated than manual measures.

Conclusion: Although both methods are reliable for cIMT measurements, the automated technique allows faster evaluation with lesser variability for all carotid segments currently used in atherosclerosis research.

Keywords: intima-media thickness, atherosclerosis, carotid segments, automated method, manual measurement, bland–altman plot






 

Other articles by Professor Ana Simoes e Silva



Readers of this article also read:

The use of sibutramine in the management of obesity and related disorders: An update
Role of aliskiren in cardio-renal protection and use in hypertensives with multiple risk factors
Effects of efforts to intensify management on blood pressure control among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension: A pilot study
Lipoprotein ratios: Physiological significance and clinical usefulness in cardiovascular prevention
Berberine: metabolic and cardiovascular effects in preclinical and clinical trials
The effect of combined renal and pancreatic transplantation on diabetic retinopathy
Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source CT angiography and coronary risk stratification
Cardiac ryanodine receptor in metabolic syndrome: is JTV519 (K201) future therapy?
Correlation of natriuretic peptides and inferior vena cava size in patients with congestive heart failure
Accuracy of the ankle-brachial index using the SCVL®, an arm and ankle automated device with synchronized cuffs, in a population with increased cardiovascular risk
  • Join ISVH

    Be part of the World's leading experts in vascular health by joining the International Society of Vascular Health (ISVH)

  • Testimonials

    "... I was impressed at the rapidity of publication from submission to final acceptance." Dr Edwin Thrower, PhD, Yale University