-
Vascular Health and Risk Management
-
About Dovepress
Open access peer-reviewed scientific and medical journals.
-
Open Access
Dove Medical Press is now a member of the Open Access Initiative
-
An Author's Guide
A guide to help authors get their paper published.
-
Advocacy
Support Open Access and Dove Press
-
Reprints
Promotional Article Monitoring - further details
-
Favored Author Program
Real benefits for authors, including fast-track processing of papers.
Comparative assessment of angiotensin receptor blockers in different clinical settings
Review
(4093) Views (1275) Full article downloads
Authors: Paolo Verdecchia, Fabio Angeli, Salvatore Repaci, et al
Published Date November 2009
Volume 2009:5 Pages 939 - 948
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S7263
Paolo Verdecchia1, Fabio Angeli1, Salvatore Repaci1, Giovanni Mazzotta1, Giorgio Gentile2, Gianpaolo Reboldi2
1Struttura Complessa di Cardiologia, Unità di Ricerca Clinica ‘Cardiologia Preventiva’, Ospedale S. Maria della Misericordia, Perugia, Italy; 2Dipartimento di Medicina Interna, Università degli Studi di Perugia, Italy
Abstract: Cardiovascular and renal disease can be regarded as progressing along a sort of continuum which starts with cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, smoking, etc) evolves with progression of atherosclerotic lesions and organ damage, and then becomes clinically manifest with the major clinical syndromes (myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, end-stage renal disease). The blood pressure control remains a fundamental mechanism for prevention of cardiovascular disease. The renin–angiotensin system is believed to play an important role along different steps of the cardiovascular disease continuum. Convincing evidence accumulated over the last decade that therapeutic intervention with angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) is effective to slow down or block the progression of cardiovascular disease at different steps of the continuum, with measurable clinical benefits. However, despite the shared mechanism of action, each ARB is characterized by specific pharmacological properties that may influence its clinical efficacy. Indeed, important differences among available ARBs emerged from clinical studies. Therefore, generalization of results obtained with a specific ARB to all available ARBs may be misleading. The present review provides a comparative assessment of the different ARBs in their efficacy on major clinical end-points along the different steps of the cardiovascular disease continuum.
Keywords: hypertension, renin–angiotensin system, valsartan, telmisartan, irbesartan, losartan, olmesartan, eprosartan
Other articles by Dr P Verdecchia
The renin angiotensin system in the development of cardiovascular disease: role of aliskiren in risk reduction- Join ISVH
Be part of the World's leading experts in vascular health by joining the International Society of Vascular Health (ISVH)
- Testimonials
"... I was impressed at the rapidity of publication from submission to final acceptance." Dr Edwin Thrower, PhD, Yale University
- The western diet and lifestyle and diseases of civilization
- Stiffness of the large arteries in individuals with and without Down syndrome
- Effects of Azelnidipine plus OlmesaRTAn versus amlodipine plus olmesartan on central blood pressure and left ventricular mass index: the AORTA study
- Vascular effects of rapid-acting insulin analogs in the diabetic patient: a review




