Back to Browse Journals » Advances in Medical Education and Practice » Volume 2

Community engagement in US and Canadian medical schools

Authors Adam O Goldstein, Rachel Sobel Bearman

Published Date January 2011 Volume 2011:2 Pages 43—49

DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S16823

Published 25 January 2011

Adam O Goldstein, Rachel Sobel Bearman
Department of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Introduction: This study examines the integration of community engagement and community-engaged scholarship at all accredited US and Canadian medical schools in order to better understand and assess their current state of engagement.
Methods: A 32-question data abstraction instrument measured the role of community engagement and community-engaged scholarship as represented on the Web sites of all accredited US and Canadian medical schools. The instrument targeted a medical school's mission and vision statements, institutional structure, student and faculty awards and honors, and faculty tenure and promotion guidelines.
Results: Medical school Web sites demonstrate little evidence that schools incorporate community engagement in their mission or vision statements or their promotion and tenure guidelines. The majority of medical schools do not include community service terms and/or descriptive language in their mission statements, and only 8.5% of medical schools incorporate community service and engagement as a primary or major criterion in promotion and tenure guidelines.
Discussion: This research highlights significant gaps in the integration of community engagement or community-engaged scholarship into medical school mission and vision statements, promotion and tenure guidelines, and service administrative structures.

Keywords: medical school, education, community service, mission, tenure, engagement

Download Article [PDF] 

Creative Commons License This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. Permissions beyond the scope of the License are administered by Dove Medical Press Limited. Information on how to request permission may be found at: http://www.dovepress.com/permissions.php

Readers of this article also read:

Doctors or technicians: assessing quality of medical education

Tayyab Hasan

Advances in Medical Education and Practice 2010, 1:25-29

Published Date: 30 September 2010

A regional model of interprofessional education

Maria Olenick, Edward Foote, Patricia Vanston, et al

Advances in Medical Education and Practice 2011, 2:17-23

Published Date: 10 January 2011

Medical students-as-teachers: a systematic review of peer-assisted teaching during medical school

Yu TC, Wilson NC, Singh PP, Lemanu DP, Hawken SJ, Hill AG

Advances in Medical Education and Practice 2011, 2:157-172

Published Date: 23 June 2011

Comparison of peer-led versus professional-led training in basic life support for medical students

Fujiwara T, Nishimura M, Honda R, Nishiyama T, Nomoto M, Kobayashi N, Ikeda M

Advances in Medical Education and Practice 2011, 2:187-191

Published Date: 26 July 2011

Laser in-situ keratomileusis in patients with diabetes mellitus: a review of the literature

Simpson RG, Moshirfar M, Edmonds JN, Christiansen SM

Clinical Ophthalmology 2012, 6:1665-1674

Published Date: 12 October 2012