Communicating sexual health messages: young adults and the female condom
Charla Markham Shaw, Karishma Chatterjee
Department of Communication, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas, USA
Purpose: This study examined how young adult college men and women (18 to 24 years of age) viewed the female condom, in terms of its viability as a technology to be used for protection against sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and unplanned pregnancies.
Patients and methods: Information sessions led by same-sex peer educators were conducted with 55 male and 94 female participants in same-sex, small groups, followed by completion of anonymous online surveys, during Spring 2013, at a large public university in the southwestern United States.
Results: Using a grounded theory approach, the core characteristics of the FC2® female condom found to be important to the female participants were its design, lack of side effects, protection, and convenience; the male participants focused on the protection and design elements.
Conclusion: Message-design implications for health promotion initiatives and practical implications for health practitioners were discussed.
Keywords: diffusion of innovation, STI prevention, pregnancy prevention, contraception
This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. Permissions beyond the scope of the License are administered by Dove Medical Press Limited. Information on how to request permission may be found at: http://www.dovepress.com/permissions.php
Readers of this article also read:
Trinks J, Hulaniuk ML, Redal MA, Flichman D
Published Date: 20 October 2014
Effect of 6 months of whole body vibration on lumbar spine bone density in postmenopausal women: a randomized controlled trial [Corrigendum]
Lai CL, Tseng SY, Chen CN, Liao WC, Wang CH, Lee MC, Hsu PS
Published Date: 18 June 2014
Clinical outcomes, not clinical utility, should be the major consideration for saxagliptin with or without metformin
Published Date: 15 April 2014
Shahar E, Shahar DJ
Published Date: 22 January 2014
Noaiseh G, Moreland L
Published Date: 1 August 2013
Shah RD, Lemon TI, Yarrow-Jenkins A
Published Date: 6 June 2013
Mizoguchi T, Ozaki M, Unoki K, Dake Y, Eto T, Arai M
Published Date: 26 October 2012
Published Date: 18 September 2012
Niven DJ, Berthiaume LR, Fick GH, Laupland KB
Published Date: 27 April 2012
Influence of demographic and metabolic variables on forearm blood flow and vascular conductance in individuals without overt heart disease
Thiago E Sartori, Rafael AB Nunes, Gisela T da Silva, et al
Published Date: 31 May 2010