-
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
-
About Dovepress
Open access peer-reviewed scientific and medical journals.
-
Open Access
Dove Medical Press is now a member of the Open Access Initiative
-
An Author's Guide
A guide to help authors get their paper published.
-
Advocacy
Support Open Access and Dove Press
-
Reprints
Promotional Article Monitoring - further details
-
Favored Author Program
Real benefits for authors, including fast-track processing of papers.
Clinical relevance of maximal inspiratory pressure: determination in COPD exacerbation
Original Research
(2410) Views (775) Full article downloads
Authors: Voicu Tudorache, Cristian Oancea, Ovidiu Fira Mlădinescu
Published Date April 2010
Volume 2010:5 Pages 119 - 123
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S9194
Voicu Tudorache1, Cristian Oancea1, Ovidiu Fira Mlădinescu2
1Department of Pneumology, 2Department of Pathophysiology, Victor Babeş University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timişoara, Romania
Abstract: Muscle dysfunction represents a pathophysiological feature of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Muscle impairment contributes to decreased effort capacity in these patients at least in the same proportion as pulmonary function limitation. Maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) is a reliable, noninvasive parameter for assessing the respiratory muscle capacity. The aim of the present study was to determine the role of MIP in effort capacity decrease in COPD patients. MIP was measured in 121 COPD patients without hyperinflation (RV < 150%) together with the following investigations: body plethysmography, body impedance analysis, dynamometry, 6-minute walking test (6MWT), determination of SaO2 and serum levels of highly sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP). MIP (kPa) was significantly decreased in moderate-severe stages (6.19 ± 2.42, COPD II; 5.35 ± 2.49, COPD III; 4.56 ± 1.98, COPD IV vs 7.90 ± 2.61 in controls, P < 0.001), whereas the muscle force assessed by dynamometry was decreased only in advanced stages of disease (0.47 ± 0.12, COPD III; 0.41 ± 0.07, COPD IV vs 0.71 ± 0.16 in controls, P < 0.001). The values of MIP correlated (r = 0.53, P = 0.0003) with the distance walked in 6MWT. MIP may provide additive information concerning the general profile of muscle dysfunction in COPD patients.
Keywords: COPD, MIP, exacerbation
Readers of this article also read:
Impact of bronchodilator therapy on exercise tolerance in COPD
Burden of COPD in a government health care system: a retrospective observational study using data from the US Veterans Affairs population
Modified BODE indexes: Agreement between multidimensional prognostic systems based on oxygen uptake
Cost-effectiveness of combination fluticasone propionate–salmeterol 250/50 μg versus salmeterol in severe COPD patients
Efficacy and safety of tiotropium Respimat® SMI in COPD in two 1-year randomized studies
An overview of the benefits and drawbacks of inhaled corticosteroids in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Changes in six-minute walking distance during pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with COPD and in healthy subjects
Pulmonary function tests, sputum induction, and bronchial provocation tests: diagnostic tools in the challenge of distinguishing asthma and COPD phenotypes in clinical practice
Onset of action of indacaterol in patients with COPD: Comparison with salbutamol and salmeterol-fluticasone
- Journal Indexing
See where all the Dove Press journals are indexed
- Testimonials
"You do a tremendous job!!" Ruben Restrepo, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
- Clinical effectiveness of the Respimat® inhaler device in managing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: evidence when compared with other handheld inhaler devices
- Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity
- The pathophysiology of bronchiectasis
- Exacerbation rate, health status and mortality in COPD – a review of potential interventions




