-
Medical Devices: Evidence and Research
-
About Dovepress
Open access peer-reviewed scientific and medical journals.
-
Open Access
Dove Medical Press is now a member of the Open Access Initiative
-
An Author's Guide
A guide to help authors get their paper published.
-
Advocacy
Support Open Access and Dove Press
-
Reprints
Promotional Article Monitoring - further details
-
Favored Author Program
Real benefits for authors, including fast-track processing of papers.
AxiaLIF system: minimally invasive device for presacral lumbar interbody spinal fusion
Review
(1680) Views (381) Full article downloads
Authors: Rapp SM, Miller LE, Block JE
Published Date August 2011
Volume 2011:4 Pages 125 - 131
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S23606
Steven M Rapp1, Larry E Miller2,3, Jon E Block31Michigan Spine Institute, Waterford, MI, USA; 2Miller Scientific Consulting Inc, Biltmore Lake, NC, USA; 3Jon E. Block, Ph.D., Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA
Abstract: Lumbar fusion is commonly performed to alleviate chronic low back and leg pain secondary to disc degeneration, spondylolisthesis with or without concomitant lumbar spinal stenosis, or chronic lumbar instability. However, the risk of iatrogenic injury during traditional anterior, posterior, and transforaminal open fusion surgery is significant. The axial lumbar interbody fusion (AxiaLIF) system is a minimally invasive fusion device that accesses the lumbar (L4–S1) intervertebral disc spaces via a reproducible presacral approach that avoids critical neurovascular and musculoligamentous structures. Since the AxiaLIF system received marketing clearance from the US Food and Drug Administration in 2004, clinical studies of this device have reported high fusion rates without implant subsidence, significant improvements in pain and function, and low complication rates. This paper describes the design and approach of this lumbar fusion system, details the indications for use, and summarizes the clinical experience with the AxiaLIF system to date.
Keywords: AxiaLIF, fusion, lumbar, minimally invasive, presacral
Other articles by Dr Jon Block
Minimally invasive treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with a novel interspinous spacer
Perspectives on the clinical utility of allografts for bone regeneration within osseous defects: a narrative review
Readers of this article also read:
Rehabilitating a brain with Alzheimer's: a proposal
Deep sedation for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a comparison between clinical assessment and NarcotrendTM monitoring
Effects of a cellulose mask synthesized by a bacterium on facial skin characteristics and user satisfaction
A better effect of cilostazol for reducing in-stent restenosis after femoropopliteal artery stent placement in comparison with ticlopidine
Everolimus-eluting stents: update on current clinical studies
Management and surgical treatment of parathyroid crisis secondary to parathyroid tumors: report of four cases
Key role of congestion in natural history of heart failure
Minimally invasive treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with a novel interspinous spacer
Effects of a transmitted light device for pediatric peripheral venipuncture and intravenous cannulation
- Testimonials
"... I was impressed at the rapidity of publication from submission to final acceptance." Dr Edwin Thrower, PhD, Yale University
- Applications of gold nanoparticles in cancer nanotechnology
- Fungus-mediated biological synthesis of gold nanoparticles: potential in detection of liver cancer
- Gold nanoparticles: From nanomedicine to nanosensing
- Nanocarriers as pulmonary drug delivery systems to treat and to diagnose respiratory and non respiratory diseases




