skip to content
Dovepress - Open Access to Scientific and Medical Research
View our mobile site

8838

Association between physician explanatory behaviors and substandard care in adjudicated cases in Japan

Original Research

(1490) Views  (331) Full article downloads

Authors: Hagihara A, Hamasaki T, Abe T

Published Date April 2011 Volume 2011:4 Pages 289 - 297
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S18727

Akihito Hagihara1, Tomoko Hamasaki2, Takeru Abe1
1Department of Health Services Management and Policy, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medicine, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, Japan; 2Department of Nutrition Faculty of Home Economics, Kyushu Women’s University, Yahatanishi, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan

Background: When a physician provides an insufficient explanation to a patient, such as regarding diagnosis, treatment, drug use, or prognosis, the physician is deemed to have delivered substandard care. It is likely that the standards applied to physicians’ explanations have changed as a result of the increased importance of patients’ rights of self-determination. However, little or no research on decisions in medical malpractice cases has been conducted with respect to this issue.
Methods: Based on decisions made in 366 medical malpractice cases between 1979 and 2008 focused primarily on the physician’s duty to explain relevant issues to patients, we examined the association between physicians’ explanatory behaviors and court decisions with respect to breaches of duty.
Results: We found that physicians’ explanatory behaviors, including relevant and specific explanations provided before treatment or surgery, were important for fulfilling a physician’s duty to explain. The data also revealed that six of the 16 types of explanatory behaviors had improved during the past three decades. However, these improvements did not contribute to the fulfillment of the physician’s duty to explain.
Conclusion: We found that there was an association between physicians’ explanatory behaviors and judicial decisions concerning substandard care, and courts were increasingly likely to consider inadequate explanatory behaviors to be a breach of the duty of care.

Keywords: physician, explanation, patient rights, self-determination




 

Other articles by Dr Akihito Hagihara



Readers of this article also read:

Periosteoplasty for covering gingival recessions: Clinical results
Role of aliskiren in cardio-renal protection and use in hypertensives with multiple risk factors
Berberine: metabolic and cardiovascular effects in preclinical and clinical trials
Information technology in pharmacovigilance: Benefits, challenges, and future directions from industry perspectives
Cough and asthma diagnosis: physicians’ diagnosis and treatment of patients complaining of acute, subacute and chronic cough in rural areas of Japan
Functional mobility and balance in community-dwelling elderly submitted to multisensory versus strength exercises
Erratum
Methemoglobinemia due to topical pharyngeal anesthesia during endoscopic procedures
Erratum - Intracellular heavy metal nanoparticle storage
Effect of long-term treatment with eyedrops for glaucoma on conjunctival bacterial flora
  • Testimonials

    "... I was impressed at the rapidity of publication from submission to final acceptance." Dr Edwin Thrower, PhD, Yale University