Back to Browse Journals » Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management » Volume 3 » Issue 4

How should we measure medication adherence in clinical trials and practice?

Authors Jeannie K Lee, Karen A Grace, Terri G Foster, Monica J Crawley, Goldina I Erowele, et al

Published Date October 2007 Volume 2007:3(4) Pages 685—690

DOI

Published 4 October 2007

Jeannie K Lee, Karen A Grace, Terri G Foster, Monica J Crawley, Goldina I Erowele, Hazel J Sun, Phuong T Turner, Lance E Sullenberger, Allen J Taylor

Pharmacy and Cardiology Services, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA

Objective: To determine if simple adherence measures, such as twenty-four hour recall and refill history, are accurate for routine use, compared to more time-consuming measures such as pill counts.

Design: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Setting: Walter Reed Army Medical Center, a tertiary medical center in Washington.

Patients: Men and women >30 years old with known coronary heart disease and taking a statin medication.

Intervention: Clinical pharmacists met with patients for adherence assessments.

Main outcome measures: Adherence was measured by pill counts, twenty-four hour recall by patient, and refill history per computer record. Temporal changes in these adherence measures were assessed using general linear models for repeated measures.

Results: Adherence was consistently greater for the experimental agent than for the statin therapy (n = 148). Mean pill count adherence for statin drug was 78.7 ± 25.2% compared to 93.5 ± 11.6% (P < 0.001) for the study agent. Refill history and twenty-four hour recall inaccurately measured adherence when compared to pill counts. Adherence, as determined by pill count, for both experimental (P = 0.029) and statin therapy (P = 0.015) showed significant variability across time in general linear models. Neither refill history nor twenty-four hour recall was sensitive to temporal changes.

Conclusions: Twenty-four hour recall and refill history inaccurately measure medication adherence for both clinical trial and clinical practice pharmacotherapies. Further, these measures are insensitive to changes in adherence. For a single or multiple assessments across time, pill count more accurately measures medication adherence. Pill count should be the standard for monitoring medication adherence for both clinical trials and clinical practice.

Keywords: adherence, hyperlipidemia, niacin, pharmacist, pill count, simvastatin

Download Article [PDF] 

Readers of this article also read:

Prevalence of dementia in Al-Quseir city, Red Sea Governorate, Egypt [Corrigendum]

El Tallawy HN, Farghly WM, Badry R, Rageh TA, Shehata GA, Hakeem M NA, El Hamed MA, Sayd MAM, Hamed Y, Kandil MR

Clinical Interventions in Aging 2014, 9:129-130

Published Date: 10 January 2014

Response to vitamin D and depression in geriatric primary care patients

Muc-Wierzgoń M, Nowakowska-Zajdel E, Klakla K, Dzięgielewska-Gęsiak S, Fatyga E, Kokot T

Clinical Interventions in Aging 2013, 8:825-827

Published Date: 3 July 2013

Tat peptide-decorated gelatin-siloxane nanoparticles for delivery of CGRP transgene in treatment of cerebral vasospasm [Corrigendum]

Tian XH, Wang ZG, Meng H, Wang YH, Feng W, Wei F, Huang ZC, Lin XN, Ren L

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2013, 8:2129-2130

Published Date: 13 June 2013

Letter to editor

Reichmann JP

International Journal of Women's Health 2013, 5:35-36

Published Date: 22 January 2013

Erratum

Marusza W, Mlynarczyk G, Olszanski R, Netsvyetayeva I, Obrowski M, Iannitti T, Palmieri B

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2012, 7:4119-4120

Published Date: 27 July 2012

Erratum

Rushmia Karim, Raf Ghabrial, Betty Lin, Arj Ananda

Clinical Ophthalmology 2010, 4:935-936

Published Date: 19 August 2010