Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
Open access peer-reviewed scientific and medical journals.
Dove Medical Press is now a member of the Open Access Initiative
An Author's Guide
A guide to help authors get their paper published.
Support Open Access and Dove Press
Promotional Article Monitoring - further details
Favored Author Program
Real benefits for authors, including fast-track processing of papers.
How should we measure medication adherence in clinical trials and practice?
(4510) Total Article Views
Authors: Jeannie K Lee, Karen A Grace, Terri G Foster, Monica J Crawley, Goldina I Erowele, et al
Published Date October 2007
Volume 2007:3(4) Pages 685 - 690
Jeannie K Lee, Karen A Grace, Terri G Foster, Monica J Crawley, Goldina I Erowele, Hazel J Sun, Phuong T Turner, Lance E Sullenberger, Allen J Taylor
Pharmacy and Cardiology Services, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
Objective: To determine if simple adherence measures, such as twenty-four hour recall and refill history, are accurate for routine use, compared to more time-consuming measures such as pill counts.
Design: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Setting: Walter Reed Army Medical Center, a tertiary medical center in Washington.
Patients: Men and women >30 years old with known coronary heart disease and taking a statin medication.
Intervention: Clinical pharmacists met with patients for adherence assessments.
Main outcome measures: Adherence was measured by pill counts, twenty-four hour recall by patient, and refill history per computer record. Temporal changes in these adherence measures were assessed using general linear models for repeated measures.
Results: Adherence was consistently greater for the experimental agent than for the statin therapy (n = 148). Mean pill count adherence for statin drug was 78.7 ± 25.2% compared to 93.5 ± 11.6% (P < 0.001) for the study agent. Refill history and twenty-four hour recall inaccurately measured adherence when compared to pill counts. Adherence, as determined by pill count, for both experimental (P = 0.029) and statin therapy (P = 0.015) showed significant variability across time in general linear models. Neither refill history nor twenty-four hour recall was sensitive to temporal changes.
Conclusions: Twenty-four hour recall and refill history inaccurately measure medication adherence for both clinical trial and clinical practice pharmacotherapies. Further, these measures are insensitive to changes in adherence. For a single or multiple assessments across time, pill count more accurately measures medication adherence. Pill count should be the standard for monitoring medication adherence for both clinical trials and clinical practice.
Keywords: adherence, hyperlipidemia, niacin, pharmacist, pill count, simvastatin
Cannotea Citeulike Del.icio.us Facebook LinkedIn Twitter
Readers of this article also read:
- American Acne and Rosacea Society
The American Acne and Rosacea Society (AARS) is a 501(c)(6) non-profit organization dedicated to elevating the understanding and treatment of acne and rosacea.
- MLA'14 -
May 16–21, 2014
- ISPOR International meeting
May 31 - June 4, 2014
- CINP World Congress
22 - 26 June, 2014
- Cancer Pharmacogenomics and Targeted Therapies
17 - 19 September, 2014
- ESMO 2014 Congress
26 - 30 September, 2014
- ACG Annual Scientific Meeting
17 - 22 October, 2014
Pennsylvania Convention Center, Philadelphia
- 27th ECNP Congress
18 - 21 October, 2014
- ISPOR 17th Annual European Congress 2014
8 - 12 November, 2014
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Enzalutamide: an evidence-based review of its use in the treatment of prostate cancer
- The benefits and risks of testosterone replacement therapy: a review
- Tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitor treatment for sarcoidosis
- Tenofovir-associated bone density loss