How should we measure medication adherence in clinical trials and practice?
Authors Jeannie K Lee, Karen A Grace, Terri G Foster, Monica J Crawley, Goldina I Erowele, et al
Published Date October 2007 Volume 2007:3(4) Pages 685—690
Published 4 October 2007
Jeannie K Lee, Karen A Grace, Terri G Foster, Monica J Crawley, Goldina I Erowele, Hazel J Sun, Phuong T Turner, Lance E Sullenberger, Allen J Taylor
Pharmacy and Cardiology Services, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
Objective: To determine if simple adherence measures, such as twenty-four hour recall and refill history, are accurate for routine use, compared to more time-consuming measures such as pill counts.
Design: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Setting: Walter Reed Army Medical Center, a tertiary medical center in Washington.
Patients: Men and women >30 years old with known coronary heart disease and taking a statin medication.
Intervention: Clinical pharmacists met with patients for adherence assessments.
Main outcome measures: Adherence was measured by pill counts, twenty-four hour recall by patient, and refill history per computer record. Temporal changes in these adherence measures were assessed using general linear models for repeated measures.
Results: Adherence was consistently greater for the experimental agent than for the statin therapy (n = 148). Mean pill count adherence for statin drug was 78.7 ± 25.2% compared to 93.5 ± 11.6% (P < 0.001) for the study agent. Refill history and twenty-four hour recall inaccurately measured adherence when compared to pill counts. Adherence, as determined by pill count, for both experimental (P = 0.029) and statin therapy (P = 0.015) showed significant variability across time in general linear models. Neither refill history nor twenty-four hour recall was sensitive to temporal changes.
Conclusions: Twenty-four hour recall and refill history inaccurately measure medication adherence for both clinical trial and clinical practice pharmacotherapies. Further, these measures are insensitive to changes in adherence. For a single or multiple assessments across time, pill count more accurately measures medication adherence. Pill count should be the standard for monitoring medication adherence for both clinical trials and clinical practice.
Keywords: adherence, hyperlipidemia, niacin, pharmacist, pill count, simvastatin
Readers of this article also read:
Muc-Wierzgoń M, Nowakowska-Zajdel E, Klakla K, Dzięgielewska-Gęsiak S, Fatyga E, Kokot T
Published Date: 3 July 2013
Tuohy E, Litt E, Alikhan R
Published Date: 20 May 2013
Upper limit of the normal range for thyrotropin-stimulating hormone is higher with increasing age [Corrigendum]
Published Date: 26 April 2013
Azelnidipine plus olmesartan versus amlodipine plus olmesartan on arterial stiffness and cardiac function in hypertensive patients: a randomized trial
Takami T, Saito Y
Published Date: 17 April 2013
Yusuf IH, Patel CK
Published Date: 8 March 2013
Increasing the oral bioavailability of poorly water-soluble carbamazepine using immediate-release pellets supported on SBA-15 mesoporous silica [Erratum]
Wang Z, Chen B, Quan G, Li F, Wu Q, Dian L, Dong Y, Li G, Wu C
Published Date: 7 February 2013
Published Date: 18 September 2012
De Caterina AR, Harper AR, Cuculi F
Published Date: 19 July 2012
Schneider EW, Johnson MW
Published Date: 16 September 2011
Corrigendum - Functional mobility and balance in community dwelling elderly submitted to multisensory versus strength exercises
Alfieri FM, Riberto M, Gatz LS, et al
Published Date: 24 November 2010