International Journal of Nanomedicine
Open access peer-reviewed scientific and medical journals.
Dove Medical Press is now a member of the Open Access Initiative
An Author's Guide
A guide to help authors get their paper published.
Support Open Access and Dove Press
Promotional Article Monitoring - further details
Favored Author Program
Real benefits for authors, including fast-track processing of papers.
Decreased bacteria activity on Si3N4 surfaces compared with PEEK or titanium
(7534) Total Article Views
Authors: Gorth DJ, Puckett S, Ercan B, Webster TJ, Rahaman M, Bal BS
Published Date September 2012
Volume 2012:7 Pages 4829 - 4840
|Received:||20 June 2012|
|Accepted:||24 July 2012|
|Published:||07 September 2012|
1School of Engineering and Department of Orthopaedics, Brown University, Providence, RI, 2Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO, 3Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
Abstract: A significant need exists for orthopedic implants that can intrinsically resist bacterial colonization. In this study, three biomaterials that are used in spinal implants – titanium (Ti), poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK), and silicon nitride (Si3N4) – were tested to understand their respective susceptibility to bacterial infection with Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphlococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli and Enterococcus. Specifically, the surface chemistry, wettability, and nanostructured topography of respective biomaterials, and the effects on bacterial biofilm formation, colonization, and growth were investigated. Ti and PEEK were received with as-machined surfaces; both materials are hydrophobic, with net negative surface charges. Two surface finishes of Si3N4 were examined: as-fired and polished. In contrast to Ti and PEEK, the surface of Si3N4 is hydrophilic, with a net positive charge. A decreased biofilm formation was found, as well as fewer live bacteria on both the as-fired and polished Si3N4. These differences may reflect differential surface chemistry and surface nanostructure properties between the biomaterials tested. Because protein adsorption on material surfaces affects bacterial adhesion, the adsorption of fibronectin, vitronectin, and laminin on Ti, PEEK, and Si3N4 were also examined. Significantly greater amounts of these proteins adhered to Si3N4 than to Ti or PEEK. The findings of this study suggest that surface properties of biomaterials lead to differential adsorption of physiologic proteins, and that this phenomenon could explain the observed in-vitro differences in bacterial affinity for the respective biomaterials. Intrinsic biomaterial properties as they relate to resistance to bacterial colonization may reflect a novel strategy toward designing future orthopedic implants.
Keywords: silicon nitride, nanostructure, anti-infective, biofilm, protein adsorption
Cannotea Citeulike Del.icio.us Facebook LinkedIn Twitter
Readers of this article also read:
- ASNM conference 2014
Join us at the American Society for Nanomedicine Conference in Maryland, March 28th - 30th 2014.
- Impact Factors
- Have an opinion about one of our articles?
We encourage you to write a letter to the editor.
- Interested in being a peer-reviewer?
Click here to register.
- MLA'14 -
May 16–21, 2014
Authors are welcome to send an abstract or draft manuscript to obtain a view from the Editor about the suitability of their paper. Please email here and include which journal you are interested in submitting your manuscript to. Our Editors will do a quick review of your paper and advise if they believe it is appropriate for submission to their journal.
- Formulation and evaluation of drug-loaded targeted magnetic microspheres for cancer therapy
- Intracellular heavy metal nanoparticle storage: progressive accumulation within lymph nodes with transformation from chronic inflammation to malignancy
- Applications of gold nanoparticles in cancer nanotechnology
- Fungus-mediated biological synthesis of gold nanoparticles: potential in detection of liver cancer