-
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
-
About Dovepress
Open access peer-reviewed scientific and medical journals.
-
Open Access
Dove Medical Press is now a member of the Open Access Initiative
-
An Author's Guide
A guide to help authors get their paper published.
-
Advocacy
Support Open Access and Dove Press
-
Reprints
Promotional Article Monitoring - further details
-
Favored Author Program
Real benefits for authors, including fast-track processing of papers.
An overview of the benefits and drawbacks of inhaled corticosteroids in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Review
(8472) Views (1418) Full article downloads
Authors: Sonal Singh, Yoon K Loke
Published Date June 2010
Volume 2010:5 Pages 189 - 195
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S6942
Sonal Singh1, Yoon K Loke2
1Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; 2School of Medicine, Health Policy and Practice, University of East Anglia, Norwich, England
Background: The benefit harm profile of inhaled corticosteroids, and their effect on patient oriented outcomes and comorbid pneumonia, osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease remain uncertain.
Methods: An overview of the evidence on the risks and benefits of inhaled corticosteroids (fluticasone and budesonide) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease from recent randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews. Observational studies on adverse effects were also evaluated.
Results: Evidence from recent meta-analysis suggests a modest benefit from inhaled corticosteroid long-acting beta-agonist combination inhalers on the frequency of exacerbations, (rate ratio [RR], 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78 to 0.88), in improvements in quality of life measures, and forced expiratory volume in one second when compared to long-acting beta-agonists alone. On the outcome of pneumonia, our updated meta-analysis of trials (n = 24 trials; RR, 1.56; 95% CI: 1.40–1.74, P < 0.0001) and observational studies (n = 4 studies; RR, 1.44; 95% CI: 1.20–1.75, P = 0.0001) shows a significant increase in the risk of pneumonia with the inhaled corticosteroids currently available (fluticasone and budesonide). Evidence for any intraclass differences in the risk of pneumonia between currently available formulations is inconclusive due to the absence of head to head trials. Inhaled corticosteroids have no cardiovascular effects.
Conclusions: Among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, clinicians should carefully balance these long-term risks of inhaled corticosteroid against their symptomatic benefits.
Keywords: inhaled corticosteroids, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pneumonia, cardiovascular events
Readers of this article also read:
Exacerbation rate, health status and mortality in COPD – a review of potential interventions
Berberine: metabolic and cardiovascular effects in preclinical and clinical trials
The pathophysiology of bronchiectasis
Potential renovascular hypertension, space missions, and the role of magnesium
Ego mechanisms of defense are associated with patients’ preference of treatment modality independent of psychological distress in end-stage renal disease
Can a gentamicin-specific chart reduce neonatal medication errors?
Nephroprotective action of glycosaminoglycans: why the pharmacological properties of sulodexide might be reconsidered
Dashboards in neonatology
Everolimus-eluting stents: update on current clinical studies
- Journal Indexing
See where all the Dove Press journals are indexed
- Testimonials
"You do a tremendous job!!" Ruben Restrepo, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
- Clinical effectiveness of the Respimat® inhaler device in managing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: evidence when compared with other handheld inhaler devices
- Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity
- The pathophysiology of bronchiectasis
- Exacerbation rate, health status and mortality in COPD – a review of potential interventions




