Back to Browse Journals » Substance Abuse and Rehabilitation » Volume 2 » Issue 1

Against professional advice: treatment attrition among pregnant methamphetamine users

Authors Lindsay B, Albrecht JS, Terplan M

Published Date October 2011 Volume 2011:2(1) Pages 189—195

DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/SAR.S25083

Published 31 October 2011

Brianna Lindsay1, Jennifer Albrecht1, Mishka Terplan1,2
1Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland, 2Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Science, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA

Abstract: Pregnant methamphetamine users who leave substance use treatment against professional advice may be at risk of poorer health outcomes. To examine the hypothesis that methamphetamine use during pregnancy may be associated with leaving substance use treatment against professional advice, the 2006 Treatment Episode Data Set was analyzed. A logistic regression adjusting for age, race, service setting, prior substance abuse treatment, criminal justice referral, and education was conducted. Inclusion criteria were met by 18,688 pregnant admissions; 26.4% identified methamphetamines as their primary substance of use. Frequency of use was identified as an effect modifier, therefore results were stratified by less than weekly use and weekly or more use. Methamphetamine use was significantly associated with leaving treatment against professional advice regardless of usage level. However, the odds of leaving treatment were greater among women using methamphetamine less than weekly. Further investigation into this association may be warranted due to the complications that may result from methamphetamine use during pregnancy.

Keywords: pregnancy, methamphetamines, treatment, attrition

Download Article [PDF] View Full Text [HTML] 

Creative Commons License This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. Permissions beyond the scope of the License are administered by Dove Medical Press Limited. Information on how to request permission may be found at: http://www.dovepress.com/permissions.php

Readers of this article also read:

Erratum

Kawaji H, Ishii M, Tamaki Y, Sasaki K, Takagi M

Orthopedic Research and Reviews 2012, 4:103-104

Published Date: 8 November 2012

Corrigendum

De Caterina AR, Harper AR, Cuculi F

Vascular Health and Risk Management 2012, 8:443-445

Published Date: 19 July 2012

Corrigendum

Hao Z, Zheng L, Kluwe L, Huang W

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2012, 7:2209-2210

Published Date: 3 May 2012

Erratum

Sumi C, Ichimaru K, Shinozuka Y

Reports in Medical Imaging 2011, 4:67-68

Published Date: 25 November 2011

Corrigendum - Functional mobility and balance in community dwelling elderly submitted to multisensory versus strength exercises

Alfieri FM, Riberto M, Gatz LS, et al

Clinical Interventions in Aging 2010, 5:363-364

Published Date: 24 November 2010

Erratum

Rushmia Karim, Raf Ghabrial, Betty Lin, Arj Ananda

Clinical Ophthalmology 2010, 4:935-936

Published Date: 19 August 2010

Prevalence of risk factors, coronary and systemic atherosclerosis in abdominal aortic aneurysm: Comparison with high cardiovascular risk population

Alberto Palazzuoli, Maddalena Gallotta, Giuseppe Guerrieri, Ilaria Quatrini, Beatrice Franci, et al

Vascular Health and Risk Management 2008, 4:877-883

Published Date: 7 September 2008