-
Drug Design, Development and Therapy
-
About Dovepress
Open access peer-reviewed scientific and medical journals.
-
Open Access
Dove Medical Press is now a member of the Open Access Initiative
-
An Author's Guide
A guide to help authors get their paper published.
-
Advocacy
Support Open Access and Dove Press
-
Reprints
Promotional Article Monitoring - further details
-
Favored Author Program
Real benefits for authors, including fast-track processing of papers.
Aerosol delivery by an ultrasonic nebulizer during different mechanical ventilation settings in a lung model – a pilot study
(2616) Views (1118) Full article downloads
Authors: Michael Winterhalter, Michael Bund, Nawid Khaladj, Christian Hagl, Andre Simon, et al
Published Date January 2008
Volume 2008:2 Pages 1 - 7
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S
Michael Winterhalter1, Michael Bund1, Nawid Khaladj2, Christian Hagl2, Andre Simon2, Ludwig Hoy3, Siegfried Piepenbrock1, Niels Rahe-Meyer1
1Department of Anaesthesiology; 2Division of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery; 3Department of Biometry, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
Abstract: Aerosol delivery of Iloprost is a promising therapeutic approach. The aim of this study was to determine the output of an ultrasonic nebulizer in different ventilation set-ups at the tip of different endotracheal tubes.
Method: In set-up A, an ultrasonic nebulizer was connected directly to the endotracheal tube. In set-up B, the nebulizer was incorporated into the inspiratory limb of the ventilator circuit; a bypass arrangement allowed to selectively direct the expiratory air discharged from the model lung. The test lungs were ventilated through a standard endotracheal tube (ET) and through a double-lumen tube (DLT). The nebulizer was filled with 5 ml of a Tc-99m 0.9%-NaCl solution. After nebulization, distribution of radioactivity was detected by gamma scintigraphy.
Results: Set-up A, ventilation in volume-controlled mode (VCV) via an ET: Delivered dose (1.61 ± 0.41 ml), nebulization time 10.13 ± 1.71 min. Set-up A, pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV), via a DLT: Delivered dose (1.33 ± 0.88 ml), nebulization time 13.27 ± 2.58 min. Set-up B, VCV mode via an ET: Delivered dose (1.57 ± 0.44 ml), nebulization time (25.9 ± 3.8 min). Set-up B, PCV mode, via a DLT: Delivered dose (1.3 ± 0.17 ml), nebulization time (25.6 ± 4.0 min). Set-up B did not yield a significantly higher output (p 0.05), but the nebulization time was significantly longer (p > 0.05) compared with set-up A.
Conclusion: Set-ups which involve connecting the nebulizer directly to an ET or a DLT exhibit sufficient output of aerosol and short nebulization times.
Keywords: nebulization, ventilation, endotracheal tube
- Testimonials
"... I was impressed at the rapidity of publication from submission to final acceptance." Dr Edwin Thrower, PhD, Yale University
- Tenofovir-associated bone density loss
- The benefits and risks of testosterone replacement therapy: a review
- Drug design with Cdc7 kinase: a potential novel cancer therapy target
- Development of mucosal adjuvants for intranasal vaccine for H5N1 influenza viruses




