skip to content
Dovepress - Open Access to Scientific and Medical Research
View our mobile site

8830

A systematic approach of tracking and reporting medication errors at a tertiary care university hospital, Karachi, Pakistan

Original Research

(2502) Views  (1560) Full article downloads

Authors: Khurshid Khowaja, Rozmin Nizar, Rashida J Merchant, Jacqueline Dias, Irma Bustamante-Gavino, Amina Malik

Published Date September 2008 Volume 2008:4(4) Pages 673 - 679
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S2646

Khurshid Khowaja1, Rozmin Nizar1, Rashida J Merchant2, Jacqueline Dias3, Irma Bustamante-Gavino4, Amina Malik1

1Division of Nursing Services, 2Nursing Education Services, 3Diploma Programme, Nurudin Jivraj Professorship of Nursing, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan; 4The Ahmed Shivji Professorship of Nursing, The Aga Khan University School of Nursing, Karachi, Pakistan

Introduction: Administering medication is one of the high risk areas for any health professional. It is a multidisciplinary process, which begins with the doctor’s prescription, followed by review and provision by a pharmacist, and ends with preparation and administration by a nurse. Several studies have highlighted a high medication incident rate at several healthcare institutions.

Methods: Our study design was exploratory and evaluative and used methodological triangulation. Sample size was of two types. First, a convenient sample of 1000 medication dosages to estimate the medication error (95% CI). We took another sample from subjects involved in medication usage processes such as physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and patients. Two sets of instruments were designed via extensive literature review: a medication tracking error form and a focus group interview questionnaire.

Results: Our study findings revealed 100% compliance with a computerized physician order entry (CPOE) system by physicians, nurses, and pharmacists. The main error rate was 5.5% and pharmacists contributed an higher error rate of 2.6% followed by nurses (1.1%) and physicians (1%). Major areas for improvement in error rates were identified: delay in medication delivery, lab results reviewed electronically before prescription, dispension, and administration.

Keywords: medication error rate, associate error rate, physician, nurse, pharmacist








Readers of this article also read:

Factors affecting therapeutic compliance: A review from the patient’s perspective
AAS, growth hormone, and insulin abuse: psychological and neuroendocrine effects
Availability of a remote online hemodynamic monitoring system during treatment in a private dental office for medically high-risk patients
Fospropofol disodium injection for the sedation of patients undergoing colonoscopy
Impact of PPIs on patient focused symptomatology in GERD
Primary care patient and provider preferences for diabetes care managers
The influence of locus control on adherence to treatment regimen among hypertensive patients
Development of a questionnaire to assess patient satisfaction with allergen-specific immunotherapy in adults: item generation, item reduction, and preliminary validation
Naftopidil for the treatment of urinary symptoms in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia
Erratum