Back to Browse Journals » Clinical Ophthalmology » Volume 6

A survey of prosthetic eye wearers to investigate mucoid discharge

Authors Pine K, Sloan B, Stewart J, Jacobs RJ

Published Date May 2012 Volume 2012:6 Pages 707—713


Received 22 February 2012, Accepted 16 March 2012, Published 10 May 2012

Keith Pine1, Brian Sloan2, Joanna Stewart3, Robert J Jacobs1

1Department of Optometry and Vision Science, 2Department of Ophthalmology, New Zealand National Eye Centre, 3Section of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

Background: This study aimed to better understand the causes and treatments of mucoid discharge associated with prosthetic eye wear by reviewing the literature and surveying anophthalmic patients.
Methods: An anonymous questionnaire was completed by 429 prosthetic eye wearers who used visual analog scales to self-measure their discharge experience for four discharge characteristics: frequency, color, volume, and viscosity. These characteristics were analyzed with age, ethnicity, years wearing a prosthesis, eye loss cause, removal and cleaning regimes, hand-washing behavior, age of current prosthesis, and professional repolishing regimes as explanatory variables. Eighteen ocularists’ Web sites containing comments on the cause and treatment of discharge were surveyed.
Results: Associations were found between discharge frequency and cleaning regimes with more frequent cleaning accompanying more frequent discharge. Color was associated with years of wearing and age, with more years of wearing and older people having less colored discharge. Volume was associated with cleaning regimes with more frequent cleaners having more volume. Viscosity was associated with cleaning regimes and years of wearing with more frequent cleaning and shorter wearing time accompanying more viscous discharge. No associations were found between discharge characteristics and ethnicity, eye loss cause, hand washing, age of current prosthesis, or repolishing regimes. Forty-seven percent of ocularists’ Web sites advised that discharge was caused by surface deposits on the prosthesis, 29% by excessive handling of the prosthesis, and 24% by other causes.
Conclusions: A standardized treatment protocol for managing discharge is lacking. More frequent prosthesis removal and cleaning was associated with more severe discharge, but the direction of cause and effect has not been established. Professional repolishing regimes had limited impact on discharge experience. Further research into the socket’s response to prosthetic eye wear, including the physical, chemical, and biological elements of the conjunctiva, the socket fluids, and the deposits that cover the prosthetic eye is recommended.

Keywords: anophthalmia, prosthetic eye, secretions, discharge, deposits

Download Article [PDF] View Full Text [HTML] 

Creative Commons License This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. The full terms of the License are available at Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. Permissions beyond the scope of the License are administered by Dove Medical Press Limited. Information on how to request permission may be found at:

Readers of this article also read:

Deposit buildup on prosthetic eyes and implications for conjunctival inflammation and mucoid discharge

Pine KR, Sloan B, Jacobs RJ

Clinical Ophthalmology 2012, 6:1755-1762

Published Date: 31 October 2012

Visual acuity and visual skills in Malaysian children with learning disabilities

Muzaliha MN, Nurhamiza B, Hussein A, Norabibas AR, Mohd-Hisham-Basrun J, Sarimah A, Leo SW, Shatriah I

Clinical Ophthalmology 2012, 6:1527-1533

Published Date: 19 September 2012

Current options for the treatment of optic neuritis

Pula JH, MacDonald CJ

Clinical Ophthalmology 2012, 6:1211-1223

Published Date: 31 July 2012

Punctal stenosis: definition, diagnosis, and treatment

Soiberman U, Kakizaki H, Selva D, Leibovitch I

Clinical Ophthalmology 2012, 6:1011-1018

Published Date: 3 July 2012

Annual direct cost of dry eye in Japan

Mizuno Y, Yamada M, Shigeyasu C

Clinical Ophthalmology 2012, 6:755-760

Published Date: 16 May 2012

Update on peripheral ulcerative keratitis

Yagci A

Clinical Ophthalmology 2012, 6:747-754

Published Date: 14 May 2012

The anterior segment of the eye in diabetes

Adeoti CO, Isawumi MA, Ashaye AO, Olomola BV

Clinical Ophthalmology 2012, 6:667-671

Published Date: 7 May 2012

The importance of rim removal in deep lateral orbital wall decompression

Kakizaki H, Takahashi Y, Ichinose A, Iwaki M, Selva D, Leibovitch I

Clinical Ophthalmology 2011, 5:865-869

Published Date: 24 June 2011

Role of aliskiren in cardio-renal protection and use in hypertensives with multiple risk factors

Eduardo Pimenta, Suzanne Oparil

Vascular Health and Risk Management 2009, 5:453-463

Published Date: 19 May 2009