skip to content
Dovepress - Open Access to Scientific and Medical Research
View our mobile site

8830

A prospective, contralateral comparison of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) versus thin-flap LASIK: assessment of visual function

Original Research

(2150) Views  (546) Full article downloads

Authors: Hatch BB, Moshirfar M, Ollerton AJ, Sikder S, Mifflin MD

Published Date April 2011 Volume 2011:5 Pages 451 - 457
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S18967

Bryndon B Hatch1, Majid Moshirfar1, Andrew J Ollerton1, Shameema Sikder2, Mark D Mifflin1
1
John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; 2Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA

Purpose: To compare differences in visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, complications, and higher-order ocular aberrations (HOAs) in eyes with stable myopia undergoing either photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) or thin-flap laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) (intended flap thickness of 90 µm) using the VISX Star S4 CustomVue excimer laser and the IntraLase FS60 femtosecond laser at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively.
Methods: In this prospective, masked, and randomized pilot study, refractive surgery was performed contralaterally on 52 eyes: 26 with PRK and 26 with thin-flap LASIK. Primary outcome measures were uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), contrast sensitivity, and complications.
Results: At 6 months, mean values for UDVA (logMAR) were -0.043 ± 0.668 and -0.061 ± 0.099 in the PRK and thin-flap LASIK groups, respectively (n = 25, P = 0.466). UDVA of 20/20 or better was achieved in 96% of eyes undergoing PRK and 92% of eyes undergoing thin-flap LASIK, whereas 20/15 vision or better was achieved in 73% of eyes undergoing PRK and 72% of eyes undergoing thin-flap LASIK (P > 0.600). Significant differences were not found between treatment groups in contrast sensitivity
(P ≥ 0.156) or CDVA (P = 0.800) at postoperative 6 months. Types of complications differed between groups, notably 35% of eyes in the thin-flap LASIK group experiencing complications, including microstriae and 2 flap tears.
Conclusion: Under well-controlled surgical conditions, PRK and thin-flap LASIK refractive surgeries achieve similar results in visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and induction of HOAs, with differences in experienced complications.

Keywords: photorefractive keratectomy, thin-flap LASIK, visual function




 

Other articles by Professor Majid Moshirfar

A Comparison of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery post-myopic LASIK/PRK Intraocular Lens (IOL) calculator and the Ocular MD IOL calculator
A prospective, randomized, fellow eye comparison of WaveLight® Allegretto Wave® Eye-Q versus VISX CustomVue™ STAR S4 IR™ in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK): analysis of visual outcomes and higher order aberrations
Bilateral total Descemet's membrane detachments after strangulation
Comparison of Hanna and Hessburg-Barron trephine and punch systems using histological, anterior segment optical coherence tomography, and elliptical curve fitting models
Complications of NewColorIris implantation in phakic eyes: a review
Corrigendum: Softec HD hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens: biocompatibility and precision
Double-pass microkeratome technique for ultra-thin graft preparation in Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty
Epithelial growth over the optic surface of the type 1 Boston Keratoprosthesis: histopathology and implications for biointegration
Evaluation of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery intraocular lens calculator for eyes with prior radial keratotomy
Femtosecond-assisted preparation of donor tissue for Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis
In vivo and in vitro analysis of topographic changes secondary to DSAEK venting incisions
Prospective, randomized, fellow eye comparison of WaveLight® Allegretto Wave® Eye-Q versus VISX CustomVueTM STAR S4 IRTM in photorefractive keratectomy: analysis of visual outcomes and higher-order aberrations
Radial keratotomy associated endothelial degeneration
Softec HD hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens: biocompatibility and precision
Surgical technique: coupling of intrastromal corneal ring segments for ectatic corneal disorders in eye bank corneas
The effect of preoperative keratometry on visual outcomes after moderate myopic LASIK


Readers of this article also read:

Role of aliskiren in cardio-renal protection and use in hypertensives with multiple risk factors
Complications of NewColorIris implantation in phakic eyes: a review
Cystoid macular edema after cataract surgery in a patient with previous severe iritis following argon laser peripheral iridoplasty
Prospective, randomized, fellow eye comparison of WaveLight® Allegretto Wave® Eye-Q versus VISX CustomVueTM STAR S4 IRTM in photorefractive keratectomy: analysis of visual outcomes and higher-order aberrations
In vivo and in vitro analysis of topographic changes secondary to DSAEK venting incisions
Cumulative clinical experience from over a decade of use of levofloxacin in community-acquired pneumonia: critical appraisal and role in therapy
Intracorneal ring implantation using Intralase® with partial coverage of the cone in a patient after an alkaline injury
Effect of caffeine on the intraocular pressure in patients with primary open angle glaucoma
Helicobacter pylori infection and primary open-angle glaucoma: is there a connection?
The management of cornea blindness from severe corneal scarring, with the Athens Protocol (transepithelial topography-guided PRK therapeutic remodeling, combined with same-day, collagen cross-linking)