-
Hepatic Medicine: Evidence and Research
-
About Dovepress
Open access peer-reviewed scientific and medical journals.
-
Open Access
Dove Medical Press is now a member of the Open Access Initiative
-
An Author's Guide
A guide to help authors get their paper published.
-
Advocacy
Support Open Access and Dove Press
-
Reprints
Promotional Article Monitoring - further details
-
Favored Author Program
Real benefits for authors, including fast-track processing of papers.
A meta-analysis that compares the use of either peginterferon-α2a or peginterferon-α2b plus ribavirin for HCV infection
Original Research
(1427) Views (493) Full article downloads
Authors: Nan Xiao, Shuang Shi, Hui Zhuang
Published Date July 2010
Volume 2010:2 Pages 99 - 109
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/HMER.S11916
Nan Xiao*, Shuang Shi*, Hui Zhuang
Department of Microbiology, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China, *These authors contributed equally to this work
Background: Two kinds of peginterferons, peginterferon-α2a (PEG-IFN-α2a) and peginterferon-α2b (PEG-IFN-α2b), are used in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. However, it is unclear which is better in terms of virological responses and patient compliance. We conducted a meta-analysis to assess which peginterferon was better when used with ribavirin.
Methods: Relevant clinical trials were identified through the PubMed and EMBASE databases. Primary outcomes included early virological response (EVR), end of treatment response (ETR) and sustained virological response (SVR). Secondary outcomes included biochemical and histological responses and the discontinuation of treatment after adverse events. Meta-analysis was performed using fixed-effect or random-effect methods, depending on absence or presence of significant heterogeneity. Analyses were performed with Review Manager Version 4.2.2.
Results: Seven clinical trials were included that involved 3,526 patients in total; six were randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and one was nonrandomized. PEG-IFN-α2a plus ribavirin was better than PEG-IFN-α2b plus ribavirin with regards to ETR (relative risk [RR] = 1.21, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.14–1.28). This advantage was less obvious for EVR (RR = 1.12, 95% CI: 1.06–1.19) and SVR (RR = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.02–1.18). Patients who received PEG-IFN-α2a were less likely to discontinue treatment for safety reasons (RR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.52–1.38).
Conclusion: We demonstrated that PEG-IFN-α2a was a better choice than PEG-IFN-α2b in terms of virological responses.
Keywords: peginterferon-α2a (PEG-IFN-α2a), peginterferon-α2b (PEG-IFN-α2b), ribavirin, chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, treatment
Erratum has been published for this article
Other articles by Ms Xiao
Erratum- Testimonials
"You do a tremendous job!!" Ruben Restrepo, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
- Oropharyngeal Crohn’s disease
- Amino acid-responsive Crohn's disease: a case study
- Methylnaltrexone in the treatment of opioid-induced constipation
- Selected luminal mucosal complications of adult celiac disease




