-
Vascular Health and Risk Management
-
About Dovepress
Open access peer-reviewed scientific and medical journals.
-
Open Access
Dove Medical Press is now a member of the Open Access Initiative
-
An Author's Guide
A guide to help authors get their paper published.
-
Advocacy
Support Open Access and Dove Press
-
Reprints
Promotional Article Monitoring - further details
-
Favored Author Program
Real benefits for authors, including fast-track processing of papers.
A current evaluation of the safety of angiotensin receptor blockers and direct renin inhibitors
Review
(2265) Views (1049) Full article downloads
Authors: Siragy HM
Published Date May 2011
Volume 2011:7 Pages 297 - 313
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S15541
Helmy M SiragyProfessor of Medicine and Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Director, Hypertension Center, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA
Abstract: The safety of angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) for the treatment of hypertension and cardiovascular and renal diseases has been well documented in numerous randomized clinical trials involving thousands of patients. However, recent concerns have surfaced about possible links between ARBs and increased risks of myocardial infarction and cancer. Less is known about the safety of the direct renin inhibitor aliskiren, which was approved as an antihypertensive in 2007. This article provides a detailed review of the safety of ARBs and aliskiren, with an emphasis on the risks of cancer and myocardial infarction associated with ARBs. Safety data were identified by searching PubMed and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Web sites through April 2011. ARBs are generally well tolerated, with no known class-specific adverse events. The possibility of an increased risk of myocardial infarction associated with ARBs was suggested predominantly because the Valsartan Antihypertensive Long-Term Use Evaluation (VALUE) trial reported a statistically significant increase in the incidence of myocardial infarction with valsartan compared with amlodipine. However, no large-scale, randomized clinical trials published after the VALUE study have shown a statistically significant increase in the incidence of myocardial infarction associated with ARBs compared with placebo or non-ARBs. Meta-analyses examining the risk of cancer associated with ARBs have produced conflicting results, most likely due to the inherent limitations of analyzing heterogeneous data and a lack of published cancer data. An ongoing safety investigation by the FDA has not concluded that ARBs increase the risk of cancer. Pooled safety results from clinical trials indicate that aliskiren is well tolerated, with a safety profile similar to that of placebo. ARBs and aliskiren are well tolerated in patients with hypertension and certain cardiovascular and renal conditions; their benefits outweigh possible safety concerns.
Keywords: angiotensin II receptor blocker, renin-angiotensin system, aliskiren, safety, myocardial infarction, cancer
Readers of this article also read:
Perioperative hypertension management
Role of aliskiren in cardio-renal protection and use in hypertensives with multiple risk factors
A combined role of calcium channel blockers and angiotensin receptor blockers in stroke prevention
Role of valsartan, amlodipine and hydrochlorothiazide fixed combination in blood pressure control: an update
Triple combination therapy with amlodipine, valsartan, and hydrochlorothiazide vs dual combination therapy with amlodipine and hydrochlorothiazide for stage 2 hypertensive patients
New class of agents for treatment of hypertension: Focus on direct renin inhibition
Role of aliskiren in blood pressure control and renoprotection
Solid self-nanoemulsifying cyclosporin A pellets prepared by fluid-bed coating: preparation, characterization and in vitro redispersibility
Clinical utility of valsartan in treatment of children and adolescents with high blood pressure
- Join ISVH
Be part of the World's leading experts in vascular health by joining the International Society of Vascular Health (ISVH)
- Testimonials
"... I was impressed at the rapidity of publication from submission to final acceptance." Dr Edwin Thrower, PhD, Yale University
- The western diet and lifestyle and diseases of civilization
- Stiffness of the large arteries in individuals with and without Down syndrome
- Effects of Azelnidipine plus OlmesaRTAn versus amlodipine plus olmesartan on central blood pressure and left ventricular mass index: the AORTA study
- Vascular effects of rapid-acting insulin analogs in the diabetic patient: a review




