skip to content
Dovepress - Open Access to Scientific and Medical Research
View our mobile site

8830

A 5° medial wedge reduces frontal but not saggital plane motion during jump landing in highly trained women athletes

Original Research

(2165) Views  (767) Full article downloads

Authors: Michael F Joseph, Craig R Denegar, Elaine Horn, et al

Published Date March 2010 Volume 2010:1 Pages 23 - 27
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OAJSM.S7793

Michael F Joseph1, Craig R Denegar1, Elaine Horn1, Bradley MacDougall1, Michael Rahl1, Jessica Sheehan1, Thomas Trojian2, Jeffery M Anderson1, James E Clark1, William J Kraemer1

1Department of Kinesiology, 2Department of Sports Medicine, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA

Abstract: Lower extremity mechanics during landing have been linked to traumatic and nontraumatic knee injuries, particularly in women’s athletics. The effects of efforts to mitigate these risks have not been fully elucidated. We previously reported that a 5° medial wedge reduced ankle eversion and knee valgus. In the present report we further investigated the effect of a 5° medial wedge inserted in the shoes of female athletes on frontal plane hip motion, as well as ankle, knee, hip, and trunk saggital plane motion during a jump landing task. Kinematic data were obtained from 10 intercollegiate female athletes during jump landings from a 31 cm platform with and without a 5° medial wedge. Hip adduction was reduced 1.98° (95% CI 0.97–2.99°) by the medial wedge but saggital plane motions were unaffected. A 5° medial wedge reduces frontal plane motion and takes the knee away from a position associated with anterior cruciate ligament injury and patellofemoral pain syndrome. Although frontal plane motion was not captured it is unlikely to have increased in a bilateral landing task. Thus, it is likely that greater muscle forces were generated in these highly trained athletes to dissipate ground reaction forces when a medial wedge was in place. Additional investigation in younger and lesser trained athletes is warranted to assess the impact of orthotic devices on knee joint mechanics.

Keywords: jump landing, foot orthotic, lower extremity kinematics, knee biomechanics, knee injury






 

Other articles by Dr Craig Denegar



Readers of this article also read:

Periosteoplasty for covering gingival recessions: Clinical results
Radiolucency below the crown of mandibular horizontal incompletely impacted third molars and acute inflammation in men with diabetes
Role of aliskiren in cardio-renal protection and use in hypertensives with multiple risk factors
Rotator cuff troublemakers: pitfalls of MRI and ultrasound
Enucleation following treatment with intravenous pentamidine for Acanthamoeba sclerokeratitis
Perception of risk and benefit in patient-centered communication and care
The relationship between deliberate self-harm behavior, body dissatisfaction, and suicide in adolescents: current concepts
Zinc oxide nanoparticles as selective killers of proliferating cells
Cumulative clinical experience from over a decade of use of levofloxacin in community-acquired pneumonia: critical appraisal and role in therapy
Erratum