-
Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine
-
About Dovepress
Open access peer-reviewed scientific and medical journals.
-
Open Access
Dove Medical Press is now a member of the Open Access Initiative
-
An Author's Guide
A guide to help authors get their paper published.
-
Advocacy
Support Open Access and Dove Press
-
Reprints
Promotional Article Monitoring - further details
-
Favored Author Program
Real benefits for authors, including fast-track processing of papers.
A 5° medial wedge reduces frontal but not saggital plane motion during jump landing in highly trained women athletes
Original Research
(1877) Views (692) Full article downloads
Authors: Michael F Joseph, Craig R Denegar, Elaine Horn, et al
Published Date March 2010
Volume 2010:1 Pages 23 - 27
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OAJSM.S7793
Michael F Joseph1, Craig R Denegar1, Elaine Horn1, Bradley MacDougall1, Michael Rahl1, Jessica Sheehan1, Thomas Trojian2, Jeffery M Anderson1, James E Clark1, William J Kraemer1
1Department of Kinesiology, 2Department of Sports Medicine, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
Abstract: Lower extremity mechanics during landing have been linked to traumatic and nontraumatic knee injuries, particularly in women’s athletics. The effects of efforts to mitigate these risks have not been fully elucidated. We previously reported that a 5° medial wedge reduced ankle eversion and knee valgus. In the present report we further investigated the effect of a 5° medial wedge inserted in the shoes of female athletes on frontal plane hip motion, as well as ankle, knee, hip, and trunk saggital plane motion during a jump landing task. Kinematic data were obtained from 10 intercollegiate female athletes during jump landings from a 31 cm platform with and without a 5° medial wedge. Hip adduction was reduced 1.98° (95% CI 0.97–2.99°) by the medial wedge but saggital plane motions were unaffected. A 5° medial wedge reduces frontal plane motion and takes the knee away from a position associated with anterior cruciate ligament injury and patellofemoral pain syndrome. Although frontal plane motion was not captured it is unlikely to have increased in a bilateral landing task. Thus, it is likely that greater muscle forces were generated in these highly trained athletes to dissipate ground reaction forces when a medial wedge was in place. Additional investigation in younger and lesser trained athletes is warranted to assess the impact of orthotic devices on knee joint mechanics.
Keywords: jump landing, foot orthotic, lower extremity kinematics, knee biomechanics, knee injury
Other articles by Dr Craig Denegar
Preferences for heat, cold, or contrast in patients with knee osteoarthritis affect treatment response-
Call For Submissions
Submit Original Research Article, Review, Case Report, or Rapid Communication in Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine
- Inflammatory mediators: Parallels between cancer biology and stem cell therapy
- Local anesthetic failure associated with inflammation: verification of the acidosis mechanism and the hypothetic participation of inflammatory peroxynitrite
- Inflammatory mechanisms in the lung
- Rotator cuff troublemakers: pitfalls of MRI and ultrasound




